Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote:
The phrase "None-dissipative resistance" is utter nonsence. It is my understanding that if the reactance of the characteristic impedance of a transmission line is zero, the characteristic impedance is non-dissipative and a pure resistance. The IEEE's "resistance = real part of impedance" is indeed often non-dissipative. If a voltage is in phase with a current, the V/I ratio is a resistance but not necessarily dissipative. That's why the IEEE has two definitions of "resistance". -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |