On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:43:11 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

So you disagree with "Wave Mechanics of Transmission Lines, Part 3:"
by S. R. Best, QEX Nov/Dec 2001?

Cecil, are you saying you believe the total nonsense in Steve's Part 3? The
fiction he wrote there is totally incorrect and misleading. He introduced nine
new misconceptions that need dispelling, misconceptions that totally dispute my
explanations of the role of wave mechanics in impedance matching, including my
references from MIT and Harvard EE professors.

I can't disclose what's about to happen in the immediate future on this issue,
but when it does happen you'll see mathematical proof of where herr Best went
wrong. And it also totally supports your argument with Gene, who apparently
doesn't get it either, because I heard him claim that Steve's article is one of
the most illuminating and definitive he's read. Unfortunately, Steve's QEX
article is total BS.

Walt, kW2DU