Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "I am assuming anything with the dimensions of "ohms" is "ohmic" but I could be wrong." As Reg once noted, you could measure Zo with your ohmmeter in an infinite line. But some people play semantic games. The IEEE dictionary generally avoids definitions of adjectives and favors adjectives plus nouns, e.g. "ohmic contact". From my physics book, an ohmic conductor is one whose resistivity is constant with changing voltage. Does "resistivity" imply dissipation? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |