| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
As Reg once noted, you could measure Zo with your ohmmeter in an
infinite line. =========================== It would not be a steady reading on the ohmeter. It would be a quick deflection followed by a slower subsidence. Zo of real lines is a function of frequency. As frequency decreases Zo increases and becomes more reactive ultimately approaching -45 degrees. This affects in a complex manner the behaviour of the ohmeter pointer. The ohmeter reading changes from an initial low value to a higher value versus time. The actual values and time taken depend on Zo and on the voltmeter resistance. The final value is never achieved just as the final voltage across a capacitor being charged up via a resistor is never achieved. To calculate input resistance versus time as recorded on the ohmeter requires a large amount of calculation using Heaviside's operational calculus. An infinite series of complicated terms is involved. This type of calculation on transmission lines must have been amongst the very first carried out by the young Heaviside himself round about 1872. It is closely related to the distortion of keying waveshapes along telegraph cables. Imagine the pleasure he experienced, using his own calculus, as he with his sliderule produced the very first sets of figures and graphs describing the waveshapes. It is still related to distortion of digital signals in this modern electronic age but now we have oscilloscopes. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
| Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
| The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna | |||