LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 11th 04, 06:10 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:
In all these sort of discussions I have never heard any mention of
"Interaction Loss", ie., that which occurs directly between the reflection
coefficients of the source and load.

It seems something important has long been and is still being neglected. It
may be that some points of dispute could be resolved by taking Interaction
Loss into account.


We usually discuss Z0-matched systems. In a Z0-matched system,
the reflection coefficients at the two reflection points are
equal in magnitude and opposite in sign. If no reflections are
allowed to reach the source, there is zero "Interaction Loss".
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Complex Z0 [Corrected] pez Antenna 41 September 11th 03 05:00 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited Richard Clark Antenna 11 July 24th 03 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017