Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
wrote: Maxwell's equations yield answers but give no clue as to the detailed physical process involved. Clueless, hmm? Clueless with respect to the underlying processes. Extremely accurate with respect to the net answers. Tomorrow I plan to be in Austin. That statement says nothing about how I plan to get there. Here's a quote from Steve's article Ah, the great satan having been invoked. How'd I peg that so square on the head? Does Steve know that you equate him to "the great satan"? I agree with that statement. But when I ask what happens to the energy in those two cancelled waves, all I get is silence. That's all it merits, Why? It's an honest question. I am absolutely amazed that physicists and engineers don't know what happens to the energy in canceled waves. It cannot be destroyed, it cannot stand still, and it's not incident upon the source. Wonder what happens to it? That's a very simple honest question. So Richard, what happens to the energy in those two cancelled waves? Destroyed? Bleeds off to a parallel universe? Routed through a black hole for constructive interference in the opposite direction? The answer is more than obvious. From those three alternatives drawn from a hat? Three card monte is a more honest game. Those are only three ridiculous possibilities. Another possibility is what the Melles-Griot web page says: The energy apparently "lost" in the destructive interference of two rearward-traveling reflected waves is not lost at all. It appears in (coherently joins) the forward-traveling wave. That's a simple answer to a simple question. Do you have a better one? And here you told us that maxwell's equations were clueless, answers that described nothing and no help at all Maxwell's equations work to obtain the answer as does quantum electrodynamics. But those answers do not contain clues about the process. The process components are what is being discussed here. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |