| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
wrote: Your argument contains logical contradictions. Because his sources acknowledge and perform to the teachings of Einstein and the workers in the fields of Quantum physics which allow such contradictions. Well, I guess that settles that. A thing is not what it is. Why didn't I think of simply denying reality? I think I get it now. When you lose an argument using a certain math model, declare that math model to be null and void. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
| Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
| The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna | |||