Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil has argued that the high impedance at the open end of a shorted 1/4-wave stub does not inhibit current into the stub. The reflection point is at the short, not at the high impedance point back 1/4-wave from the short. That sounds reasonable to me, but I wonder if it makes any difference. Only to those who think the stub is a physical open-circuit at the mouth of the stub and therefore, no current flows in the stub. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |