Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
I was wrong when I wrote waves would be exhibitable on demand were they annhilated. Cecil was right. It makes no difference whether two equal and opposite signals are received or no signal is received. Same result. Which means that if two coherent waves flowing in the same direction are completely cancelled, the E-fields and the H-fields in that direction are also cancelled and therefore, zero energy propagates in that direction. So the question remains: What happens to the energy in those two rearward- traveling cancelled waves? Melles-Griot says the energy is not lost and instead appears as enhanced intensity in the forward-traveling wave. From rearward-traveling energy to forward-traveling energy certainly sounds like a direction reversal to me. "Enhanced Intensity" is another name for constructive interference and in a matched system, it is "total constructive interference". "Complete Wave Cancellation" is another name for "total destructive interference". Bottom line: In a Z0-matched system, the reflected energy flows rearward to the Z0-match point, changes direction at the Z0-match point (because of interference), and joins the forward energy wave flowing toward the load. Anyone got a better word than "re-reflected" to describe that event? From looking at a diagram of laser light encountering a perfect 1/4WL thin-film coating on glass, it is apparent that all the rearward-traveling reflected irradiance (power) encounters a conjugate "mirror" and joins the forward-traveling energy wave. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |