LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 13th 04, 10:58 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Walter Maxwell wrote:
In a stub constructed of lossless material the only current that flows in the
stub is that required to bring it up to the steady statecondition.

In a practical stub with attenuation current flows into the stub continually,
but only that sufficient to compensate for the loss due to attenuation to retain
it's steady state condition.


All that is true for *NET* current, Walt. But a full magnitude of forward and
reflected current is flowing in and out of the mouth of the stub. All of the
reflections in a stub occur at the shorted end. What happens at the mouth of
the stub is superposition and interference, not reflection. The forward and
reflected voltages superpose (in phase) to a high net value and the forward
and reflected currents superpose (out of phase) to a low net value.

(|Vfwd|+|Vref|)/(|Ifwd|-|Iref|) = very high V/I ratio = very high impedance,
but that high impedance is an effect and not the cause of anything (except
arguments on r.r.a.a :-)

Inside the stub, Vfwd/Ifwd = Z0 and Vref/Iref = Z0

Anyone can prove this to himself. Install a wattmeter 1/8WL down into the 1/4WL
shorted stub. One will read high forward power and high reflected power. From
those powers, one can actually calculate the forward and reflected voltages
and currents at that halfway point within the stub given that halfway point
is equal to 45 degrees.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Complex Z0 [Corrected] pez Antenna 41 September 11th 03 05:00 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited Richard Clark Antenna 11 July 24th 03 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017