Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walter Maxwell wrote:
In a stub constructed of lossless material the only current that flows in the stub is that required to bring it up to the steady statecondition. In a practical stub with attenuation current flows into the stub continually, but only that sufficient to compensate for the loss due to attenuation to retain it's steady state condition. All that is true for *NET* current, Walt. But a full magnitude of forward and reflected current is flowing in and out of the mouth of the stub. All of the reflections in a stub occur at the shorted end. What happens at the mouth of the stub is superposition and interference, not reflection. The forward and reflected voltages superpose (in phase) to a high net value and the forward and reflected currents superpose (out of phase) to a low net value. (|Vfwd|+|Vref|)/(|Ifwd|-|Iref|) = very high V/I ratio = very high impedance, but that high impedance is an effect and not the cause of anything (except arguments on r.r.a.a :-) Inside the stub, Vfwd/Ifwd = Z0 and Vref/Iref = Z0 Anyone can prove this to himself. Install a wattmeter 1/8WL down into the 1/4WL shorted stub. One will read high forward power and high reflected power. From those powers, one can actually calculate the forward and reflected voltages and currents at that halfway point within the stub given that halfway point is equal to 45 degrees. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |