Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"What is the linear source impedance of a class-C amp?" A conjugate match is necessary for maximum power transfer. A Class C amplifier is not inherently linear. That is disasterous for an already modulated AM signal but it is of no importance to an FM signal. As Richard Fry points out, no tank circuit is required. A low-pass filter to suppress all harmonics is all that is needed for a clean signal. No tuning is required of a tank at the operating frequency. A tank circuit is not selective enough to prevent intermod anyway. When I worked the morning shift at 790 KHz in Houston, and I fired up the transmitter, I would hear 740 KHz`audio coming out of the monitor speaker. They started programming earlier than we did. They were 15 miles away. Our transmitting antenna made a dandy receiving antenna. The received 740 KHz modulated our final amplifier and we rebroadcast it although at a level much lower than our own modulation. Any one listening to 790 KHz who turned up the volume to hear the 740 KHz audio got their ears knocked off when our modulation started. We had high level plate modulation of the final amplifier for our own signal. For the 740 KHz signal the level of modulation was much lower, millivolts not kilovolts. Either program was cleanly modulated on our carrier. The only difference was the enormous difference in modulation levels. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
"Most supply authorities would not allow you to connect a capacitive load (a leading PF load),-----." Incorrect. Overexcited synchronous machines are commonly used to correct the power factor causing reduced line current and lower power loss on the a-c power transmission line. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roy Lewallen" wrote
No mysterious "reverse r-f energy" is needed to explain this well-known and well-understood phenomenon. __________ The quote above reads as though the existence of reverse (reflected) r-f energy is being denied. For skeptics, the link below leads to a field report showing a measurement of the reflection of a narrowband r-f pulse by an analog broadcast TV antenna, back toward the source. The H.A.D. of the sinČ pulse used represents the shortest transition time that can be accommodated in a ~ 4 MHz transmission channel. Note that the reflected pulse appears some 6.2 ”s after the incident pulse, which corresponds to a round trip through the ~1,525 feet of 6" OD, 75 ohm, air pressurized transmission line leading to the antenna in this system. The return pulse amplitude indicates a far-end match (elbow complex + antenna) of about 1.05 VSWR (2.3% reflection). http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...easurement.gif RF (RCA Broadcast Field Engineer 1965-1980) |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "What is the linear source impedance of a class-C amp?" A conjugate match is necessary for maximum power transfer. Is the class-C amp conjugately matched during the 75% of the cycle when it is off? Is there any such thing as an instantaneous conjugate match? Don't we have to move downstream from non-linear sources for our linear math models to start working? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
"Roy Lewallen" wrote No mysterious "reverse r-f energy" is needed to explain this well-known and well-understood phenomenon. __________ The quote above reads as though the existence of reverse (reflected) r-f energy is being denied. Especially strange since the "reverse r-f energy" is the cause of the impedance responsible for the mismatch problem. If there were no "reverse r-f energy", the impedance causing the mismatch wouldn't even exist. Why is the cause of the offending impedance of no importance? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Richard Harrison wrote: Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "What is the linear source impedance of a class-C amp?" A conjugate match is necessary for maximum power transfer. Is the class-C amp conjugately matched during the 75% of the cycle when it is off? Is there any such thing as an instantaneous conjugate match? Don't we have to move downstream from non-linear sources for our linear math models to start working? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Richard, its a common myth that Class C amps are non-linear, but the truth of the matter is that although the condition at the input of the pi-network is decidedly non-linear, the energy storage in the pi-network tank circuit isolates the input from the output and the result is a totally linear condition at the output of the pi-network. Evidence proving this is true is that the output of an unmodulated signal at the output of the network is an almost pure sine wave. With a Q of at least 12 the difference between a pure sine wave from a signal generator and that from the pi-network output can not be seen on a dual trace scope with the traces overlapping. I don't know about the energy storage in the filters you mention, but I would assume that if the filter output is a sine wave then the energy storage required to produce a linear output is sufficient. Walt, W2DU |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "What is the linear source impedance of a class-C amp?" A conjugate match is necessary for maximum power transfer. *in a linear system* |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Lux wrote:
"in a linear system" It produces no significant harmonics, so the system is linear. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transfer Impedance(LONG) | Shortwave | |||
Efficiency of Power Amplifiers | Antenna | |||
Matching , Power Transfer & Bandwidth | Antenna | |||
max power transfer theorem | Antenna |