BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

Highland Ham wrote:
John Smith wrote:
BTW ... I AM an amateur, IDIOT!

But, you allude to the correct assumption, an amateur with a LARGE
brain is much preferred to the example you demonstrate.
==========================================
IF you are a licensed radio amateur , show us the courtesy to include
your callsign ,like all others contributing to this NG.

I have not come across a single licensed radio amateur , calling another
radio amateur an i***t !

What about 'trying' to show good manners.


Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Brother, I'd not show you the crack of my arse in a thong, don't ask ya
queer!

wink

Regards,
JS

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

Dave wrote:


then you haven't been reading this group for long!



Ummm, what is long? Some women might consider six inches
long--yanno--it is all relative! LOL

Regards,
JS

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

John Smith wrote:
wrote:
John Smith wrote:
wrote:

...
Low bandwidth my ass, a full USENET feed is gigabytes per day.

Know nothing fool.




Perhaps a valid argument for those on dialup or with inadequate access
to the net.

Gigs ain't nothin', we move towards terabytes ... those thinking in gigs
are destined to the path of the dinosaur ...

A full T1 line is 1.5 megabits/sec.

The theoretical maximum bandwidth of DSL is 8 megabits/sec and you
will be lucky to get 6 megabits/sec.

A full USENET feed, one way, is about 130 GB day.

130 Gbytes X 8 bits = 1 X 10^12 bits.

1 X 10^12 bits / 6 X 10^6 bit/sec = 1.6 X 10^5 seconds = 46 hours.

So since there are only 24 hours in a day, you need the equivelant of
2 full, good DSL connections just to handle the incoming feed.

Add to the connections necessary for the outgoing feed.

And to store 30 days worth is 4 terabytes of storage.

As I said, know nothing fool.

BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times?



Wow!!! If everyone was as you, you would be correct!

You mean if everyone could do simple arithmetic they would realize
you are a babbling idiot who can't put together a grammatical sentence?

Unfortunately you either offer substandard ISP bandwidth, or you are an
idiot--now let me guess???? :-)

Bandwidth doesn't come from ISP's, they lease it from the carriers.

Once again you show you know nothing.

But hey, you add bytes of usage--maybe you will even find someone who
cares or believes you!! Good going man! BTW--are you from a 3rd world
country?

Can't do simple arithemetic, can you?

I notice you have zero facts to offer in rebuttal; just frothing
nonsense.

BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

John Smith wrote:
wrote:

...
Can't do simple arithemetic, can you?

I notice you have zero facts to offer in rebuttal; just frothing
nonsense.

Interesting ... yawn

Yeah, I know, you wouldn't recognize a fact if it hit you in the
middle of your forehead.

BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times?



Uh, just psychic I guess! grin

Or you a

A) A lier in addition to being a babbling arm waver.

B) Too clueless to know what "plonk" means or how to actually do it.

C) All of the above.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

John Smith wrote:
wrote:
John Smith wrote:
wrote:

...
Can't do simple arithemetic, can you?

I notice you have zero facts to offer in rebuttal; just frothing
nonsense.

Interesting ... yawn

Yeah, I know, you wouldn't recognize a fact if it hit you in the
middle of your forehead.

BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times?




Uh, just psychic I guess! grin

Or you a

A) A lier in addition to being a babbling arm waver.

B) Too clueless to know what "plonk" means or how to actually do it.

C) All of the above.



I am sorry, I just didn't know who I was dealing with when this began
with you ...

You wouldn't know who you were dealing with if you were staring in a
mirror talking to yourself.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

Res wrote:


The best way to deal with that troll is ignore it, oh and of course if
you have root to your news server, you add his nntp providor into
cleanfeed and send his service providor a notice of such and why ;)



Excellent advice. Consider yourself ignored ...

P.S. providor = provider, just for your future reference ...

Regards,
JS

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

BIG Brothers' attack on USENET--i.e. our forum here ...
 

John Smith wrote:
wrote:

...
You wouldn't know who you were dealing with if you were staring in a
mirror talking to yourself.



I don't believe I have ever seen another with more examples of how to be
an idiot at his/her disposal, amazing ... I suppose your demonstration
of being a troll is adequate--however, I have seen better.

You shouldn't be using big words whose meaning you don't know, like
"troll".


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.