Radiation and dummy loads
 

On Jul 3, 4:58 pm, John Smith wrote:
Dale Parfitt wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Jul 3, 12:25 pm, wrote:
On Jul 3, 11:08 am, Art Unwin wrote:

Following the logic of my posting it shows a clear conflict between
normal thinking and mine.

The operative words being "normal thinking and mine (Art's)"

That about sums it up.

Well, yes and no ...

When you consider that the "normal IQ" is between 100-110 for the USA,
as a whole, and depending on the area in question (a survey onboard a
quality campus would blow that out of the water--and an IQ of 120+ used
to automatically qualify you for OTS (other qualifications
pending/applying) ... one could come up with a scenario(s) where
"normal" is not, necessarily, all that desirable ...

Regards,
JS

Correct........ Normal in America is to strive to be a lemming
I can't be normal as it takes me more than one try to discern the
characters in the picture
which is needed before one can post

Radiation and dummy loads
 

On Jul 3, 5:16 pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:58 pm, John Smith wrote:



Dale Parfitt wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Jul 3, 12:25 pm, wrote:
On Jul 3, 11:08 am, Art Unwin wrote:

Following the logic of my posting it shows a clear conflict between
normal thinking and mine.

The operative words being "normal thinking and mine (Art's)"

That about sums it up.

Well, yes and no ...

When you consider that the "normal IQ" is between 100-110 for the USA,
as a whole, and depending on the area in question (a survey onboard a
quality campus would blow that out of the water--and an IQ of 120+ used
to automatically qualify you for OTS (other qualifications
pending/applying) ... one could come up with a scenario(s) where
"normal" is not, necessarily, all that desirable ...

Regards,
JS

Correct........ Normal in America is to strive to be a lemming
I can't be normal as it takes me more than one try to discern the
characters in the picture
which is needed before one can post
'
You know John, since America gives the 'right to bear arms' you would
think that the population would understand
that a projectile must have rotation to follow a straight line
trajectory.
Straight line trajectory is also a property of radiation, so we not
only have to eject particles at rest
from a radiator surface but we also have to apply 'twist' to the
ejected particle otherwise the particles will scatter!
Again the foucault or eddy currents come to the fore where their
circulatory action apply torgue to the ejected particle
Why is it so hard for Americans to understand that radiation is a
result of radial ejection of particles via a rejective rotary magnetic
field ?. Especially when particles in equilibrium is part and parcel
of Gaussian law which when extended to the same environment as the
Maxwellian law? Today we have total resistance to this evidence and
instead prefer to act like lemmings rather than face change.
Regards
Art
I haven't purchased a ARRL publication for years but I suspect they
are still talking of radiation as being wave form.

Radiation and dummy loads
 

Art,
I think you had better stick to antennas, leave firearms alone,
don't go there. One of your earlier
statements covers all this very well. There's nothing wrong with
being normal, you know.
- 'Doc

(Also, don't run with scissors!)

Radiation and dummy loads
 

Art Unwin wrote:

'
You know John, since America gives the 'right to bear arms' you would
think that the population would understand
...

Hmmm, got rid of my .357 ... just have an old, but in excellent shape,
..45 ... I am not sure, but I suspect this would stop a "home
invader"--even if you missed and hit him in the hand ...

...
Why is it so hard for Americans to understand that radiation is a
result of radial ejection of particles via a rejective rotary magnetic
field ?. Especially when particles in equilibrium is part and parcel
of Gaussian law which when extended to the same environment as the
Maxwellian law? Today we have total resistance to this evidence and
instead prefer to act like lemmings rather than face change.
Regards
Art
I haven't purchased a ARRL publication for years but I suspect they
are still talking of radiation as being wave form.

Hmmm ... I am still holding out a bit longer before calling the jury in
.... the new developments of being able to take "pictures" of light
waves/particles needs completely explored and given time for the
technology to improve/mature.

But, it certainly looks the absolute proof of what light "is", is a LOT
closer at hand. :-)

Regards,
JS

Radiation and dummy loads
 

On Jul 3, 7:19 pm, wrote:
Art,
I think you had better stick to antennas, leave firearms alone,
don't go there. One of your earlier
statements covers all this very well. There's nothing wrong with
being normal, you know.
- 'Doc

(Also, don't run with scissors!)

Great, more free speech which provides more understanding as who and
what you are.
I encourage all to exercise free speech so all can see and understand
what motivates you
and why you spend so much time on the couch! By the way you don't have
a doctorate so you have no
such education for which we should acknowledge or respect!
Speak up, love to hear from you.
Art]

Radiation and dummy loads
 

John Smith wrote:

...
But, it certainly looks the absolute proof of what light "is", is a LOT
closer at hand. :-)

Regards,
JS

Yanno, they have NOT even taken a "picture" of a HIGH POWER RF wave
though an excitable gas (MASER), yet. Let's see that first ...

Regards,
JS

Radiation and dummy loads
 

On Jul 3, 7:43 pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
'
You know John, since America gives the 'right to bear arms' you would
think that the population would understand

...

Hmmm, got rid of my .357 ... just have an old, but in excellent shape,
.45 ... I am not sure, but I suspect this would stop a "home
invader"--even if you missed and hit him in the hand ...

...
Why is it so hard for Americans to understand that radiation is a
result of radial ejection of particles via a rejective rotary magnetic
field ?. Especially when particles in equilibrium is part and parcel
of Gaussian law which when extended to the same environment as the
Maxwellian law? Today we have total resistance to this evidence and
instead prefer to act like lemmings rather than face change.
Regards
Art
I haven't purchased a ARRL publication for years but I suspect they
are still talking of radiation as being wave form.

Hmmm ... I am still holding out a bit longer before calling the jury in
... the new developments of being able to take "pictures" of light
waves/particles needs completely explored and given time for the
technology to improve/mature.

But, it certainly looks the absolute proof of what light "is", is a LOT
closer at hand. :-)

Regards,
JS

John , nothing wrong in having a weapon to protect your home and
rights.
It is when those same weapons are used to threaten and scare the
populace
that things go wrong especially when they suggests such threats to
repell free speech
and for all to read before hand! So a projectile must have rotation to
travel in a straight line
but you must not mention that as it is tyrinical. But he did come in
on time as I anticipated
and applied logic to antennas as he sees it. Soon others will take
their turn since logic
applied is getting closer to the norm
When the President was on a train aproaching my town a porter cried
out "ten minuits to Normal"
with respect to the upcoming rail road station
That is how the book by the presidents adviser from Texas was named
i.e. Ten minuits from Normal
so I am very familiar with Normal people
Regards
Art

Radiation and dummy loads
 

Art Unwin wrote:
I am trying to understand why a low swr repetitive over a band of
frequencies is considered by hams to be a dummy load.! This

That is NOT what was stated. As usual you aren't paying attention.

tom
K0TAR

Radiation and dummy loads
 

Art Unwin wrote:

...
so I am very familiar with Normal people
Regards
Art

OK, enough said; and this final comment of mine ends this "normal"
thread ... at least for myself.

You know as well as I, normal is much over-rated. Normal people are
just not that interesting. While violent nuts are a drag; and, nuts
which live in true "La La Land" cannot be tolerated for long periods of
time--the most interesting people lie in between these and "normal" ...

Regards,
JS

Radiation and dummy loads
 

Art Unwin wrote:
presents a problem In my thinking as neutrinos particle which is a
type of carbon because it is a side product of fusion

Well, that will sure cause heartburn for a lot of physicists, who
believe it is a lepton, while carbon is an atom. Also the neutrino is
massless as far as we know, and carbon very definitely has mass.

Now why do I think you will now tell me I, and the whole world of
physics, is wrong?

tom
K0TAR