On Jul 3, 11:06 pm, Tom Ring wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 3, 10:00 pm, Tom Ring wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
what I am sharing and I will never be silenced so my feet turn to lead
in the face of wrong doing applied to others who have done no
wrong.That is exactly how Hitler came to power where those who did
nothing got their just deserts.
Art
You are a very sick person. Get help.

tom
K0TAR

Make your point by proving it. Many will stand behind you
with that comment but first prove the mathematics presented are in
error.
That would certainly separate you from others who are not educated to
determine same
other than sharing with others what and who you are.
When those mathematics are proved to be in error my whole findings
fall apart .
. Where I would lose credence where you would gain without the need
for
insult which gains nothing. Is there not anybody in this world can
prove that the extended law of Gauss
when subject to the addition of radiators and a time varying field is
not the equal of Maxwells law?
Anybody from any country of any color or religeon willing to present
to Americans that indeed the
laws become the same? Or do you find the possibility of insults from
americans to daunting to speak up?
Be strong
Regards
Art

This was not an insult Art, this was in reference to the last sentence
in your statement which follows -

That is exactly how Hitler came to power where those who did
nothing got their just deserts.
Art

Sounds like a lightly veiled threat to me.

tom
K0TAR

Gee, I have no idea why you say that.
I want somebody, probably from outside America who knows something
about mathematics, communist, muslim or otherwise
who can inform the american ham where the similarity lies between
Gauss and Maxwell . This is mainly an american forum
and they are determined to deny any mathematics that supplies a
similarity between these two gentlemen from Europe. Mathematics shown
up to now showed that Gaussian law of statics when extended to include
a radiator and a time varying field cannot, and does not,equal
Maxwell's law despite the mathematic manouvaring that show that they
are the same. They also bring in to question antenna programs with
optimizer that produce arrays where all is in equilibrium, or programs
that show radiators tipped with respect to ground
as a response to Foucault current ala the weak field, required by the
masters prior to Maxwell. We all know the statement regarding garbage
in means garbage out and that is the label they are determined to
foist upon all. The equality of these laws leads to the fact that a
radiator may be of 'any shape, size or elevation as long as it is in
equilibrium and is capable of producing eddy currents'.
This suggests to me that some members are full bent on preventing this
knowledge being shared with all, for why I do not know
Even tho it was an american with a doctorate working for the space
department who supplied confirming mathematics.
There is a need for efficient electrically full wave antennas
contained within a smaller volume hitherto known and nobody can stop
the advance of science where curiousity abounds. Somebody some where
will produce one and then the race will be on but it disappoints me
that it will not be America where the fall of the dollar will continue
world wide.
Why american antenna engineers continue to pursue small efficient
fractional antenna I do not know when the above presents the means of
point radiation which leads to more efficient radiators of a smaller
volume. I need a mathematician to come forward to blow this scheming
apart for the benefit of all including those on the other side of the
pond.
Happy fourth of July to all Americans and hopefully change is near.
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ......Personal page...."unwinantennas.com/"