On Jul 6, 7:14 pm, wrote:


Doc
most posters who disagree with Art on this thread at least put
up an alternative to Art's claim's, you on the other hand have nothing
to offer as usual, so instead you attack the man as you did in times
past to no effect. The fellow ******* who used to follow are no longer
around, you are on your own!.
In my neck of the woods Doc's who are not on top of their subjects
are known as quack's, so I suggest before you post again you bone up
on the subject in question, or are you so far out of your depth that
you are only able to attack the man?.

derek wrote:
On Jul 6, 7:14 pm, wrote:


Doc
most posters who disagree with Art on this thread at least put
up an alternative to Art's claim's, you on the other hand have nothing
to offer as usual, so instead you attack the man as you did in times
past to no effect. The fellow ******* who used to follow are no longer
around, you are on your own!.
In my neck of the woods Doc's who are not on top of their subjects
are known as quack's, so I suggest before you post again you bone up
on the subject in question, or are you so far out of your depth that
you are only able to attack the man?.

Arthur doesn't provide specifics. He doesn't provide the math. He is
short on fact and long on misspelled pontification. Excuse me if I
don't accept his wild claims at face value. If he can't explain them
(and the burden of proof is on him), why should any of us be bothered?

Dave K8MN

On Jul 6, 1:57 pm, Dave Heil wrote:
derek wrote:
On Jul 6, 7:14 pm, wrote:

Doc
most posters who disagree with Art on this thread at least put
up an alternative to Art's claim's, you on the other hand have nothing
to offer as usual, so instead you attack the man as you did in times
past to no effect. The fellow ******* who used to follow are no longer
around, you are on your own!.
In my neck of the woods Doc's who are not on top of their subjects
are known as quack's, so I suggest before you post again you bone up
on the subject in question, or are you so far out of your depth that
you are only able to attack the man?.

Arthur doesn't provide specifics. He doesn't provide the math. He is
short on fact and long on misspelled pontification. Excuse me if I
don't accept his wild claims at face value. If he can't explain them
(and the burden of proof is on him), why should any of us be bothered?

Dave K8MN

Everything that I have done has been shared on this newsgroup.
The mathematics have been shown. A array in equilibrium has been shown
and over
checked independently on this newsgroup An antenna was sent
to a member of this newsgroup for verification A page has been
supplied with how to make it.
David ,you are just another lemming that has arrived apon the scene

derek,
I would suggest that my post was not a personal attack (unlike yours),
instead, it was an attempt to try to show Art an aspect of his
behavior that he probably doesn't realize is showing up. And as has
already been pointed out, how can anyone prove or disprove 'proof'
that has not been presented? To this point, all I have seen is
opinions, and in some cases, some fairly imaginative opinions.
About the "Doc", it's a user name, and nickname. Doesn't mean that
I'm a doctor of anything. And I have never claimed to be. I didn't
pick it, it was given to me. If I can learn to 'live' with it, you
can too. And if you can't, then that's too bad.
'Nuff of that.
- 'Doc

On Jul 6, 2:24 pm, Art Unwin wrote:


Everything that I have done has been shared on this newsgroup.
=0.0543
Not enough content to be usable.

The mathematics have been shown.
=0

A array in equilibrium has been shown
and over

You won't even define how you apply the term equilibrium, much
less show an example of it.

checked independently on this newsgroup

I assume you refer to the skewed element antenna.
IE: the one I called the cluster@#$%...
You know, the one with six skewed elements that
gave less gain than a well tuned 3 el yagi?

An antenna was sent
to a member of this newsgroup for verification

And the report on it's performance has not been received.
Where's the beef?
You are not even supplying a textured vegetable patty
as a substitute.. :/

A page has been
supplied with how to make it.

I sure don't see one shown at:
http://unwinantennas.com/

David ,you are just another lemming that has arrived apon the scene

Kinda like Doktor MIT? I guess he drowned in the last migration..
He seems to have disappeared from the scene.
Chortle... :/ But can't say I blame him really.