Art wrote:
"If this is so, why do not Maxwell`s laws provide the role of particles
in radiation?"

Maxwell`s equarions adequately describe electrical behavior without
resort to particles.

Art should read "Radio-Electronic Transmission Fundamentals" by B.
Whitfield Griffith, Jr. Its first chapter is: "A Brief History of
Electrical Knowledge". Maxwell`s equations are covered in Chapter 38,
"The Mechanism of Radiation".

On page 9, Griffirh wrote:
"Maxwell studied deeply the equations he had written and noted that they
were similar in form to equations which were used to express the motion
of waves in water. This made it clear to him that electromagnetic waves
could exist, and he was able to calculate the speed at which they would
travel.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

On Jul 6, 11:30 am, (Richard Harrison)
wrote:
Art wrote:

"If this is so, why do not Maxwell`s laws provide the role of particles
in radiation?"

Maxwell`s equarions adequately describe electrical behavior without
resort to particles.

Art should read "Radio-Electronic Transmission Fundamentals" by B.
Whitfield Griffith, Jr. Its first chapter is: "A Brief History of
Electrical Knowledge". Maxwell`s equations are covered in Chapter 38,
"The Mechanism of Radiation".

On page 9, Griffirh wrote:
"Maxwell studied deeply the equations he had written and noted that they
were similar in form to equations which were used to express the motion
of waves in water. This made it clear to him that electromagnetic waves
could exist, and he was able to calculate the speed at which they would
travel.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

And did he mention the role of stati
cs or particles in radiation?
I keep on reading that radiation is not fully understood
in present day books!
Give me a book that does understand and provide
the role of particles and then make us all happy

Art wrote:
"I keep reading that radiatiation is not fully understood in present day
books!"

Maybe so, but it is good enough for near perfect design of practical
antennas.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

Richard Harrison wrote:
Art wrote:
"I keep reading that radiatiation is not fully understood in present day
books!"

Maybe so, but it is good enough for near perfect design of practical
antennas.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI


It could be said also that it is good enough for practical design of
near perfect antennas. All of Art's voo-doo theory cannot hold even a
candle to either concept!

Dean -- W4IHK

On Jul 6, 12:49 pm, (Richard Harrison)
wrote:
Art wrote:

"I keep reading that radiatiation is not fully understood in present day
books!"

Maybe so, but it is good enough for near perfect design of practical
antennas.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

But it does not lead to a path of small antennas!
I think it is really odd that hams defy or disbelieve what a antenna
optimizer supplies
Why are they not attacking computor programs? Or describe where they
are wrong
Yup, they believe sll is known and THEY are the masters

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Jul 6, 11:30 am, (Richard Harrison)
wrote:
Art wrote:

"If this is so, why do not Maxwell`s laws provide the role of particles
in radiation?"

Maxwell`s equarions adequately describe electrical behavior without
resort to particles.

Art should read "Radio-Electronic Transmission Fundamentals" by B.
Whitfield Griffith, Jr. Its first chapter is: "A Brief History of
Electrical Knowledge". Maxwell`s equations are covered in Chapter 38,
"The Mechanism of Radiation".

On page 9, Griffirh wrote:
"Maxwell studied deeply the equations he had written and noted that they
were similar in form to equations which were used to express the motion
of waves in water. This made it clear to him that electromagnetic waves
could exist, and he was able to calculate the speed at which they would
travel.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

And did he mention the role of stati
cs or particles in radiation?

particles are not necessary, so of course not.

I keep on reading that radiation is not fully understood
in present day books!

which books? quotes please, not hand waving. i have given you quotes, now
you provide the ones that your theory is based on.

Give me a book that does understand and provide
the role of particles and then make us all happy

go back to one of the aetherist's and you can have all the particles
propagating waves that you want... but they still won't work like your
neutrino/carbon things hopping off diamagnetic materials.