Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am trying to understand why a low swr repetitive over a band of
frequencies is considered by hams to be a dummy load.! This consistently shows up in statements by the itelligensia of this newsgroup. Following up on the logic of that idea it would suggest that if swr was totally constant ( not sure how that could be) then all radiation must be zero or self cancelling.? This thus suggests that if a log periodic antenna was unlimitted in the number of elements used would in the limit drop down to zero radiation!. So following the thinking of this group the oscillations that I show on my page unwinantennas.com/ as a progression towards zero radiation since Q eventually is going to equal zero. Is this why the decreasing oscillation is defined as a dummy load on this newsgroup? The term comes up so often that I am compelled to look for what I am missing, especially since carbon is conductive and thus in the minds of many must therefore be radiative! Ofcourse the statement bandied around that if a material is condunctive then it must radiatiate could become fact instead of an old wives tales if stated enough times. Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dummy Loads, 900 mhz Isolators, 30 DB isolation ports | Swap | |||
Reflection on Resistive loads | Antenna | |||
Checkin' out dummy loads with a VNA... | Homebrew | |||
bunch of dummy loads and connectors FS 3.00 each | Swap | |||
Oil for dummy loads | Antenna |