Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 6:26 am, "Richard Fry" wrote:
Rather than continually posting your beliefs about *why* your Unwin antenna operates, please post some provable evidence about *how* it operates with respect to the fields generated by a standard and well-proven radiator such as 1/2-wave dipole. A matched, 100% efficient, linear 1/2-wave dipole with 100 watts of applied r-f input power at 3.5 MHz develops a peak field intensity of about 70.14 mV/m at a distance of 1 kilometer, in free space. How does the Unwin antenna compare to this? If you don't know, or you do and it is considerably less than the value above -- then probably there is little point in proceeding with your posts. RF I have enougth on my hands explaining antennas in equilibrium and you want me to change course in the middle and switch to what. you want to talk about! I'll tell you what, refer to what happens to a current carrying member as descibed on my page. Now go to a member that is not in equilibrium and where the external charges move to one end to meet Newtons law and thus charges in the center which formally were equal to zero now have a quantitive value. This states that when equilibrium breakjs down current flowsw in the CENTER of the conductor. Start your own thread on that subject while we continue with antennas in equilibrium |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
KB9RQZ posts his bio | Antenna | |||
I crap on posts | Policy | |||
Why can't I see my posts????? | Equipment | |||
When your posts are NOT your posts... | Policy |