Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 14th 08, 11:28 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default ART'S ANTENNA

On Jul 14, 10:51 am, "Frank" wrote:
Hi Art
The details for the variometer would be of help if you could
oblige thank you.


Derek


The following explains the construction:

http://www.g0mrf.freeserve.co.uk/variometer.htm

Variometers can be very lossy variable inductors. For proper
matching 2 elements are required.

73,

Frank


2 elements required? What does that mean?
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 01:10 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default ART'S ANTENNA

Art Unwin wrote:

...
2 elements required? What does that mean?


Who knows absolutely?

But, most likely, he means a dipole.

On a full wave monopole with no counterpoise and choking off the outer
braid ... I guess you have "one element" as opposed to "2 elements" (for
example: monopole-with-counterpoise/dipole 1/4 wave, 1/2 wave.)

But then, I am guessing. scratches head

Regards,
JS
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 01:23 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Default ART'S ANTENNA

2 elements required? What does that mean?

In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match
a complex impedance, as follows:

Shunt C, Series L;
Shunt L, Series C;
Series L, Shunt C, or;
Series C, Shunt L.

Only rarely can a single component provide a match.

73,

Frank


  #4   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 02:13 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default ART'S ANTENNA

On Jul 14, 7:23 pm, "Frank" wrote:
2 elements required? What does that mean?


In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match
a complex impedance, as follows:

Shunt C, Series L;
Shunt L, Series C;
Series L, Shunt C, or;
Series C, Shunt L.

Only rarely can a single component provide a match.

73,

Frank


Has not a variometer 2 elements?
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 02:36 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Default ART'S ANTENNA

In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match
a complex impedance, as follows:

Shunt C, Series L;
Shunt L, Series C;
Series L, Shunt C, or;
Series C, Shunt L.

Only rarely can a single component provide a match.

73,

Frank


Has not a variometer 2 elements?


No. A variometer is simply a variable inductor.

I should also have added to the above:
Series L, Shunt L etc. etc.......

Frank




  #6   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 03:23 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default ART'S ANTENNA

On Jul 14, 8:36 pm, "Frank" wrote:
In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match
a complex impedance, as follows:


Shunt C, Series L;
Shunt L, Series C;
Series L, Shunt C, or;
Series C, Shunt L.


Only rarely can a single component provide a match.


73,


Frank


Has not a variometer 2 elements?


No. A variometer is simply a variable inductor.

I should also have added to the above:
Series L, Shunt L etc. etc.......

Frank


Then what I can do is to split the circuit in half of a varometer
and connect one in series with the positive and one in series to the
negative
so I have equal turns added or subtracted of opposite wound and
controlled by the single motor.
Sounds good
  #7   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 08:44 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Default ART'S ANTENNA

Then what I can do is to split the circuit in half of a varometer
and connect one in series with the positive and one in series to the
negative
so I have equal turns added or subtracted of opposite wound and
controlled by the single motor.
Sounds good


Not sure I understand what you mean. Comments by Roy, and
others, noted. All these methods are certainly valid. The first step is to
determine the actual impedance of your load before you attempt
to match it, and then design an appropriate network.
For measurement a vector network analyzer is the best method,
but expensive. The "TAPR" analyzer, by Tentec looks
good at $655. Most of the cheap analyzers are not very
accurate, and VSWR is not very useful.

The Smith Chart; provided by Dellsperger, at:
http://www.fritz.dellsperger.net/ is an excellent (free) tool for
matching network design. Also Chris Bowick's
"RF Circuit Design" (At Amazon.com) provides an
insight in the use of the Smith Chart.

Experimentation by variable: series L, shunt C, or shunt C, series L,
could provied a reasonable match. Others probably
have some practical idea.

73,

Frank


  #8   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 09:18 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default ART'S ANTENNA

On Jul 15, 2:44 pm, "Frank" wrote:
Then what I can do is to split the circuit in half of a varometer
and connect one in series with the positive and one in series to the
negative
so I have equal turns added or subtracted of opposite wound and
controlled by the single motor.
Sounds good


Not sure I understand what you mean. Comments by Roy, and
others, noted. All these methods are certainly valid. The first step is to
determine the actual impedance of your load before you attempt
to match it, and then design an appropriate network.
For measurement a vector network analyzer is the best method,
but expensive. The "TAPR" analyzer, by Tentec looks
good at $655. Most of the cheap analyzers are not very
accurate, and VSWR is not very useful.

The Smith Chart; provided by Dellsperger, at:http://www.fritz.dellsperger.net/is an excellent (free) tool for
matching network design. Also Chris Bowick's
"RF Circuit Design" (At Amazon.com) provides an
insight in the use of the Smith Chart.

Experimentation by variable: series L, shunt C, or shunt C, series L,
could provied a reasonable match. Others probably
have some practical idea.

73,

Frank


Yes Frank I for some reason found myself settlled on 50 0hms impedance
and I can'r remember why and I didn't make a note of it.
In retrospect I should be looking at around 200 plus or minus! This
should not change to repetitiveness of resonances which is of
importance
for all frequency coverage.
So I am going back to the 100 ohm and upwards that I started with and
first check on sw BC and then fine tune on transmit.
I also checked back on the programming and got somewhere near your
figures tho in practicality my measured impedance
were way higher. I suspect the twisting of wires is the culprit for
the differences
Regards
Art
Regards
Art
  #9   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 07:33 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default ART'S ANTENNA

Frank wrote:
2 elements required? What does that mean?


In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match
a complex impedance, as follows:

Shunt C, Series L;
Shunt L, Series C;
Series L, Shunt C, or;
Series C, Shunt L.

Only rarely can a single component provide a match.


Other combinations can be used, for example, adjusting a transmission
line stub length and position, or a transformer in conjunction with a
reactance. The point is that an impedance has two values, commonly
expressed as R and X or as a magnitude and phase angle, so to achieve a
specific impedance requires two "degrees of freedom" -- that is, two
things which you can adjust and which, in simple terms, don't adjust
exactly the same thing. With only one adjustable element, you can get a
specific R, say, or X, but not both.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 05:09 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default ART'S ANTENNA

Roy Lewallen wrote:
With only one adjustable element, you can get a
specific R, say, or X, but not both.


With only one adjustable element, i.e. ladder-line length,
I get X=0 and 35 R 85 ohms which is close enough to
50 ohms for most of us non-perfectionists.

http://www.w5dxp.com/notuner.htm
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Three Uses for the MFJ-956 Shortwave Antenna Pre-Selector / Tuner - Applies to most Pre-Selectors and Antenna Tuners RHF Shortwave 0 April 9th 06 10:16 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? RHF Shortwave 20 December 31st 05 09:41 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 0 December 28th 05 05:24 AM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 3 December 27th 05 09:59 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 09:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017