Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 10:51 am, "Frank" wrote:
Hi Art The details for the variometer would be of help if you could oblige thank you. Derek The following explains the construction: http://www.g0mrf.freeserve.co.uk/variometer.htm Variometers can be very lossy variable inductors. For proper matching 2 elements are required. 73, Frank 2 elements required? What does that mean? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
... 2 elements required? What does that mean? Who knows absolutely? But, most likely, he means a dipole. On a full wave monopole with no counterpoise and choking off the outer braid ... I guess you have "one element" as opposed to "2 elements" (for example: monopole-with-counterpoise/dipole 1/4 wave, 1/2 wave.) But then, I am guessing. scratches head Regards, JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
2 elements required? What does that mean?
In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match a complex impedance, as follows: Shunt C, Series L; Shunt L, Series C; Series L, Shunt C, or; Series C, Shunt L. Only rarely can a single component provide a match. 73, Frank |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 7:23 pm, "Frank" wrote:
2 elements required? What does that mean? In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match a complex impedance, as follows: Shunt C, Series L; Shunt L, Series C; Series L, Shunt C, or; Series C, Shunt L. Only rarely can a single component provide a match. 73, Frank Has not a variometer 2 elements? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match
a complex impedance, as follows: Shunt C, Series L; Shunt L, Series C; Series L, Shunt C, or; Series C, Shunt L. Only rarely can a single component provide a match. 73, Frank Has not a variometer 2 elements? No. A variometer is simply a variable inductor. I should also have added to the above: Series L, Shunt L etc. etc....... Frank |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 8:36 pm, "Frank" wrote:
In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match a complex impedance, as follows: Shunt C, Series L; Shunt L, Series C; Series L, Shunt C, or; Series C, Shunt L. Only rarely can a single component provide a match. 73, Frank Has not a variometer 2 elements? No. A variometer is simply a variable inductor. I should also have added to the above: Series L, Shunt L etc. etc....... Frank Then what I can do is to split the circuit in half of a varometer and connect one in series with the positive and one in series to the negative so I have equal turns added or subtracted of opposite wound and controlled by the single motor. Sounds good |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then what I can do is to split the circuit in half of a varometer
and connect one in series with the positive and one in series to the negative so I have equal turns added or subtracted of opposite wound and controlled by the single motor. Sounds good Not sure I understand what you mean. Comments by Roy, and others, noted. All these methods are certainly valid. The first step is to determine the actual impedance of your load before you attempt to match it, and then design an appropriate network. For measurement a vector network analyzer is the best method, but expensive. The "TAPR" analyzer, by Tentec looks good at $655. Most of the cheap analyzers are not very accurate, and VSWR is not very useful. The Smith Chart; provided by Dellsperger, at: http://www.fritz.dellsperger.net/ is an excellent (free) tool for matching network design. Also Chris Bowick's "RF Circuit Design" (At Amazon.com) provides an insight in the use of the Smith Chart. Experimentation by variable: series L, shunt C, or shunt C, series L, could provied a reasonable match. Others probably have some practical idea. 73, Frank |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 15, 2:44 pm, "Frank" wrote:
Then what I can do is to split the circuit in half of a varometer and connect one in series with the positive and one in series to the negative so I have equal turns added or subtracted of opposite wound and controlled by the single motor. Sounds good Not sure I understand what you mean. Comments by Roy, and others, noted. All these methods are certainly valid. The first step is to determine the actual impedance of your load before you attempt to match it, and then design an appropriate network. For measurement a vector network analyzer is the best method, but expensive. The "TAPR" analyzer, by Tentec looks good at $655. Most of the cheap analyzers are not very accurate, and VSWR is not very useful. The Smith Chart; provided by Dellsperger, at:http://www.fritz.dellsperger.net/is an excellent (free) tool for matching network design. Also Chris Bowick's "RF Circuit Design" (At Amazon.com) provides an insight in the use of the Smith Chart. Experimentation by variable: series L, shunt C, or shunt C, series L, could provied a reasonable match. Others probably have some practical idea. 73, Frank Yes Frank I for some reason found myself settlled on 50 0hms impedance and I can'r remember why and I didn't make a note of it. In retrospect I should be looking at around 200 plus or minus! This should not change to repetitiveness of resonances which is of importance for all frequency coverage. So I am going back to the 100 ohm and upwards that I started with and first check on sw BC and then fine tune on transmit. I also checked back on the programming and got somewhere near your figures tho in practicality my measured impedance were way higher. I suspect the twisting of wires is the culprit for the differences Regards Art Regards Art |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank wrote:
2 elements required? What does that mean? In most cases an inductor, and capacitor, is required to match a complex impedance, as follows: Shunt C, Series L; Shunt L, Series C; Series L, Shunt C, or; Series C, Shunt L. Only rarely can a single component provide a match. Other combinations can be used, for example, adjusting a transmission line stub length and position, or a transformer in conjunction with a reactance. The point is that an impedance has two values, commonly expressed as R and X or as a magnitude and phase angle, so to achieve a specific impedance requires two "degrees of freedom" -- that is, two things which you can adjust and which, in simple terms, don't adjust exactly the same thing. With only one adjustable element, you can get a specific R, say, or X, but not both. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
With only one adjustable element, you can get a specific R, say, or X, but not both. With only one adjustable element, i.e. ladder-line length, I get X=0 and 35 R 85 ohms which is close enough to 50 ohms for most of us non-perfectionists. http://www.w5dxp.com/notuner.htm -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|