Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... (snip) Usuaully its the stations the FCC did a screw-job on. They already had low-band analog and were given either a low-band transition or a depricated UHF transition in 52-69. Congress should have mandated that the FCC find space on high VHF or UHF for all stations that wanted it, with an emphasis on making a market have all on UHF where possible, and where not possible, put many on high VHF so that not a single station is alone there. Phil, Some stations wanted to remain on the low VHF channels for power and propagation reasons. Some broadcasters in the Midwest with large coverage areas get a lower electric bill on those channels even though the threat of interference is higher. Interference is a bigger problem in metropolitan areas than it is in the flat rural corn fields of the U.S. bread basket. David |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rotors & VHF/UHF Yagi's - Sat. Antenna Hardline - more | Swap | |||
Do you always need a ground when you use an outdoor antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Feeding two Yagi's from One Coax. | Antenna |