| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:30:48 -0500, Bob Bob
wrote: Hi Richard Isnt there a difference there? (I'll admit I dont think in these terms. I use the actual pattern instead) Isn't F/B a comparison of "forward" vs "backward" at the optimum/best case "single angle" and Back Rejection (or some other name) the comparison of all radiated power forward vs backwards? Many parasitic designs end up with very good F/B but as soon as you go off a few degrees a rearward lobe comes into play. Cheers Bob VK2YQA Richard Clark wrote: What's the difference between FRONT TO BACK RATIO and BACK REJECTION? Hi BobČ, If you examine the specifications for both, they reveal exactly the same value. It follows they measure the same thing but use different terms (one can only imagine they have ad writers who find their inspiration for straining terms in claims for Gussian antennas). There are very few antennas with a null located at 180° (Cardioid comes to mind); and, as you infer, it quickly disappears off boresight. Further, your suggestion of average forward compared to average backward is, perhaps, a useful indicator. However, neither supplier appears to interested in averages. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FS: KLM 10-4 10 meter beam NIB | Antenna | |||
| WTB: 6 meter beam. | Swap | |||
| F.S. New 10 meter beam | CB | |||
| F.S. New 10 meter beam | Equipment | |||
| FS: 11 Meter Beam (10 Meter Trimmed?) | General | |||