Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... "826" wrote in : Hi. Have a new Hustler 6 band vertical. Installed the radials and also buried 75 foot of RG213 coax between shack and antenna. I used a 6 foot peace of coax connected to adjust the antenna with a MFJ-259. Every band was tuned to the middle and SWR was lower than 1.7:1 at the edges. After the adjustments, I reconnected the buried coax to the antenna and on all bands everything had shift up by any where from 200 to 400 khz. Now the rig is seeing greater than 2:1 SWR. Should I retune the antenna with the MFJ 259 in the shack? Vern, An oft asked question, and there are usually emphatic answers readily proffered. You might find my article at http://www.vk1od.net/VSWR/displacement.htm relevant to understanding what goes on 'within' the transmission line, and the 'Traps for players' heading offers reasons why behaviour that is inconsistent with transmission line behaviour may be observed. In your case, one of the things you appear to have done is the change the thing that was measured. You adjusted the antenna with the shield of the main feedline disconnected. This is discussed under the heading 'Disturbing the thing being measured'. Owen Hi, Sorry I didn't rely sooner. The weather hasn't been too good hear. This morning I disconnected the coax from the shack and measured the antenna with the six foot length of coax. It looked OK. I then connected just the shield of the long coax going to the shack and still measuring with the short coax it shifted just like measured before in the shack. I have then made up a choke balun and installed it at the base of the antenna and it improved everything by about 60%. I will now make another one for the shack end. I think everything is under control now. Thanks to all for heading me in the right direction. Vern M0WQR |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"826" wrote in
: Hi, Sorry I didn't rely sooner. The weather hasn't been too good hear. This morning I disconnected the coax from the shack and measured the antenna with the six foot length of coax. It looked OK. I then connected just the shield of the long coax going to the shack and still measuring with the short coax it shifted just like measured before in the shack. I have then made up a choke balun and installed it at the base of the antenna and it improved everything by about 60%. I will now make another one for the shack end. I think everything is under control now. Thanks to all for heading me in the right direction. Vern M0WQR Vern, whilst the choke made a difference, the fact that there remains a difference in the feedpoint impedance with the shield connected and disconnected, even when using the choke, indicates that there is some effects observable from common mode feed line current in your scenario. If you want a measurement of the antenna as it would be used, measure it as it would be used... make sure the shield current path is as it would be used. Owen |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... "826" wrote in : Hi, Sorry I didn't rely sooner. The weather hasn't been too good hear. This morning I disconnected the coax from the shack and measured the antenna with the six foot length of coax. It looked OK. I then connected just the shield of the long coax going to the shack and still measuring with the short coax it shifted just like measured before in the shack. I have then made up a choke balun and installed it at the base of the antenna and it improved everything by about 60%. I will now make another one for the shack end. I think everything is under control now. Thanks to all for heading me in the right direction. Vern M0WQR Vern, whilst the choke made a difference, the fact that there remains a difference in the feedpoint impedance with the shield connected and disconnected, even when using the choke, indicates that there is some effects observable from common mode feed line current in your scenario. If you want a measurement of the antenna as it would be used, measure it as it would be used... make sure the shield current path is as it would be used. Owen Hi all, The antenna is now working very well on all bands. After installing both choke baluns at the antenna base and in the shack, the resonant points measured from the shack end were the same as with the short coax at the antenna without the longer coax shield connected. Everything is OK now. All it needed was the two baluns. Regards Vern M0WQR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
826 wrote:
... Owen Hi all, The antenna is now working very well on all bands. After installing both choke baluns at the antenna base and in the shack, the resonant points measured from the shack end were the same as with the short coax at the antenna without the longer coax shield connected. Everything is OK now. All it needed was the two baluns. Regards Vern M0WQR Your path sounds very similar to mine. At first, unless the plans/specs called for a balun/choke, I ignored the need. Now I use one, or more, no matter what ... I picked up that knowledge here. At first, the loss of the balun/choke made me hesitant--I no longer worry about those trivial matters. :-) Regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yagi in Proximity of Vertical/SNR problem..answers??? | Antenna | |||
Vertical antenna problem | Antenna | |||
Odd problem with 6/2/70 triband vertical | Antenna | |||
Dual Band vertical (2m/70 cm) problem / details | Antenna | |||
Hustler 6btv Vertical Tech Problem | Antenna |