Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You wrote:
... Sonny, you seem to be using the Inverse, of the Inverse Square Law here.... the Farther the source is from the receiver the LESS power reaches the receiver, not MORE. It goes Down, by the SQUARE of the distance, not up. You also don't get ALL of the 300 Milliwatts going into your head as the antenna is semi Omni-directional and only about 120 degrees of the 360 degree transmitted signal will intersect with your head, and another maybe 10 degrees with you hand. Better go back and do the Sums, AGAIN, or leave it to folks that passed Jr. High School Math, and High School Physics. EXACTLY! That is why the further the source is from the "receiver/your-skull" the further the sources power must be increased to maintain the same field-density! You got it! Inverse Square Law in action! Or, ~2:4 ratio--every doubling in distance requires the fourfold increase of the sources output to maintain field density -- what part of my posts must I "rewrite" for you to obtain that meaning from them? Regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|