"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
Look if you really want the RF evaluation done, I need to charge you for
it.
I could show you where you are wrong in your calculation, verify what is
correct and you can do what you want with it. It will cost you even
more if
I have to actually measure the power bandwidth and density of the actual
unit.

You spoke earlier about widespread corruption and no trust beyond your
fear.
I can understand suspicion, but your fear is largely based on the
unknown.
It might help you to consider that manufacturers are largely motivated
by
greed, so it would be absurd to worry that they would spend the extra
money
to exceed the FCC specifications for maximum output, although I'm sure
that
there are individuals who would spend the extra money for an amplifier.
I
would suspect that sales would get their money and the customer would be
sent to the complaint department to get their money's worth and the
responsibility would fall.

http://infotech.awardspace.com/



Ahhh, you are an idiot!

You will have to excuse me. Yanno, sometimes you just run into that
rare circumstance where, at first the person "seems normal." After a
bit of dialog, however, you realize "there is no one home ...

1) They (cell phones) DON'T exceed the maximum allowed--and THAT IS
SCARY! (1.6W per Kg ... how much does your head weigh?)

2) An amplifier would do you little good unless you could also increase
the output on the cell tower ... but then, I don't like burnt toast! ;-)


I was joking about actually putting an amplifier on any wireless device that
you can put in your pocket and runs on batteries. But I guess I have to be
very careful with the ignorant and superstitious, because an offhand quip
might be taken to heart and grow to be a religion like your exposure rant.
You call them "cell towers" because it is your boogie man. You probably
haven't even been on a tour to a transmitter site.

3) The "damage" we "debate" is of such a nature, it could only be found
it statistical studies--all studies to date are flawed ...

4) I expect "this problem" to take longer sorting out than the the
tobacco problem/danger. How many deaths from tobacco alone?

5) Massive corruption, greed and loss of trust, that is in question?
What else do you call it when the will of the people is constantly
ignored; and when all-else-fails, the courts are called in to make a
decision that the will of the people is NOT constitutional! (Rather
illogical when the constitution takes justification from "we the people
..." I believe that same justification is used in the California law.)

6) New Orleans has still not recovered, despite "federal help", many are
still without homes--google it! If it were in another country, we could
have emergency supplies anywhere in the world in a matter of days and
begin helping rebuild in a matter of weeks ... more goes on in Oz than
meets than eye ... the terrorists only need to walk across the
border--good for us they are too stupid to figure that out ... I guess.


PLONK!

Regards,
JS

Everyone check this out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

Read the section on "Red Herring fallacies"


Your numbers are all wrong so you call me an idiot. These newsgroups are
googled and will probably be around for a while. Your conclusions based on
your own erroneous suppositions won't make me an idiot. But you obviously
have an environmental liberal whacko agenda to promote or you would produce
your evidence.

My 30 year + observations of a community of professionals (and not so
professionals) is the only statistical evidence I need to prove your dog
can't walk because it has no legs.

If you want to do some good, why don't you rant about X-ray exposure from
CRT's and why everyone should get rid of them in favor of LCD's for computer
monitors, because I guarantee it is way more a health risk than little
wireless devices.

You are correct that California is way AFU, but you don't know the half of
it. Until you do, the same mistakes will be made when it comes to your
town, because you are lock-stepped to belief systems that reject reality, so
you will continually lay the blame for your error elsewhere until it has you
by the throat.