| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... Dave Holford wrote: If you want to do some good, why don't you rant about X-ray exposure from CRT's and why everyone should get rid of them in favor of LCD's for computer monitors, because I guarantee it is way more a health risk than little wireless devices. I spent 5 years in front of large CRTs while wearing a radiation monitor. When no one showed any sign of radiation the monitoring ceased. Did pick up some radiation from unrelated sources, but nothing from the CRTs. Probably getting more radiation from the ionization smoke detector on the ceiling of my den! Not to mention all the natural sources - bananas for example. There is a lot of lead in that CRT glass. That stops the X rays rather nicely. So I guess the fellow is saying that there is absolutely no effects. And guarantees it also. I'm impressed by the level of confidence he has. - 73 de Mike N3LI - The only use of the word guarantee I see it the foregoing is "because I guarantee it is way more a health risk than little wireless devices." in reference to CRT X-rays. But the bannanas and granite countertop in the kitchen might be a problem. Dave |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Holford wrote:
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... Dave Holford wrote: If you want to do some good, why don't you rant about X-ray exposure from CRT's and why everyone should get rid of them in favor of LCD's for computer monitors, because I guarantee it is way more a health risk than little wireless devices. I spent 5 years in front of large CRTs while wearing a radiation monitor. When no one showed any sign of radiation the monitoring ceased. Did pick up some radiation from unrelated sources, but nothing from the CRTs. Probably getting more radiation from the ionization smoke detector on the ceiling of my den! Not to mention all the natural sources - bananas for example. There is a lot of lead in that CRT glass. That stops the X rays rather nicely. So I guess the fellow is saying that there is absolutely no effects. And guarantees it also. I'm impressed by the level of confidence he has. - 73 de Mike N3LI - The only use of the word guarantee I see it the foregoing is "because I guarantee it is way more a health risk than little wireless devices." in reference to CRT X-rays. But the bannanas and granite countertop in the kitchen might be a problem. Dave Dave; Don't forget the radioactive potasium in your heart. Another Dave |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
David G. Nagel wrote:
Dave Holford wrote: But the bannanas and granite countertop in the kitchen might be a problem. Dave Dave; Don't forget the radioactive potasium in your heart. Yeah, and trees make CO2 so they are responsible for global warming. ;^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Coslo wrote in news:g8fadf$1iqk$1
@f04n12.cac.psu.edu: David G. Nagel wrote: Dave Holford wrote: But the bannanas and granite countertop in the kitchen might be a problem. Dave Dave; Don't forget the radioactive potasium in your heart. Yeah, and trees make CO2 so they are responsible for global warming. ;^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - No Mike that's caused by cow belches John W3JXP |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Passaneau wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote in news:g8fadf$1iqk$1 @f04n12.cac.psu.edu: David G. Nagel wrote: Dave Holford wrote: But the bannanas and granite countertop in the kitchen might be a problem. Dave Dave; Don't forget the radioactive potasium in your heart. Yeah, and trees make CO2 so they are responsible for global warming. ;^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - No Mike that's caused by cow belches From both ends, it would seem! - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Coslo wrote:
Yeah, and trees make CO2 so they are responsible for global warming. ;^) They do? All this time I was certain that trees produced oxygen. Dave K8MN |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Heil wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote: Yeah, and trees make CO2 so they are responsible for global warming. ;^) They do? All this time I was certain that trees produced oxygen. Dave K8MN During the daylight hours, trees and other plants do make oxygen. At night, in the dark, they do consume some of the oxygen--however, there is a net gain; i.e. they do "make oxygen." Regards, JS |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Heil wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote: Yeah, and trees make CO2 so they are responsible for global warming. ;^) They do? All this time I was certain that trees produced oxygen. We're both right, Dave. Trees produce CO2 or O2 depending on the time of day. I can smell the changeover as it is getting dark and the trees shift. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Coslo wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: Michael Coslo wrote: Yeah, and trees make CO2 so they are responsible for global warming. ;^) They do? All this time I was certain that trees produced oxygen. We're both right, Dave. Trees produce CO2 or O2 depending on the time of day. I can smell the changeover as it is getting dark and the trees shift. My trees only shift in a heavy wind, Mike. Now I have this video stuck in my head of you sniffing the output of trees at twilight. ;-) Dave K8MN |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Heil wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote: My trees only shift in a heavy wind, Mike. Now I have this video stuck in my head of you sniffing the output of trees at twilight. ;-) The XYL says I look kinda like a dog, sniffing at the air. Probably is a litle disturbing to watch! ;^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|