| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:31:40 GMT, "aunwin"
wrote: .... give the pros and cons between a series circuit and a parallel circuit from which to base a radiator ? .... Just to give you a start a series circuit radiator is a dipole. And we will say a parallel circuit radiator is one with at least one capacitive lumped circuit and one inductive lumped circuit in parallel. .... Here is a start A dipole provides a lot of signals at the same time( good) A parallel circuit can only supply one signal at a time (bad ) Get the idea? Hi Art, A dipole is the most efficient antenna. The parallel circuit offers loss to an already most efficient antenna. A dipole is simple to load and often requires no matching. The parallel circuit is difficult to load and always requires matching. A dipole offers a standard of gain. The parallel circuit offers no change in gain except the prospect of reducing it through making the antenna smaller to become a resonant system. A dipole is a simple construction. The parallel circuit adds complexity which raises the prospects of mechanical and electrical failure. A dipole offers hazardous potentials at its tips. A parallel circuit double that danger by offering hazardous potentials at both its tips and its drive point. A dipole requires isolation/insulation at its tips due to high potentials. A parallel circuit requires isolation/insulation at its drive point AND its tips due to high potentials. Is that the idea? I presume you can distinguish good/bad. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||