Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Harrison" wrote in message ... Art, KB9MZ wrote: "It does not mean that a radiating antenna which is in the parallel configuration will have a high impedance." Parallel configuration can mean several things. I will take it to mean the antenna shares some of the characteristics of a parallel resonant circuit. So now 'WILL' can now be read as 'CAN' with respect to impedance 'EXCEPT' in the case of circuitry where radiation is ignored At last,..... at last.... even tho grudgingly. So now you cannot use that as a reason for me to lie about my having an antenna in parallel form You CAN have a low resistance of 1 ohm or you CAN have one 1000 ohms so play your silly games about me being a lier, don't hold your breath, have no integrity and also a thief, all of which have been thrown at me because I stated I have a rotatable beam for 160 meters that has a moveable 5 khz pass band. Now you have the problem of explaining to people that you can have a parallel arrangement for an antenna and we were wrong to focuss on the high impedance aproach to accuse Art of lying and all the other accusations that was thrown at him. Now ask the people involved why they refused to check for themselves or do they have a backup technical augument. You made a point about the loop dipole well the patent office accepted it as viable even tho my writing was not clear because they had a samplke. The University of Illinois accepted it for review ( Yes I spoke also to the professor of Log periodic fame as well, very interesting person) The antenna director in charge or general Boss stated my claims were confirmed. So the antenna experts in this group don't understand how it functions so immediately get in to gear to attack. Didn't Walter lead the last attack on a guy, any attempt to squash inovation. Now I can rest peacefully seeing that you are exposed for what you are. Now when you see the next antenna in print you can chant what all followers say....Well I knew that all the time, at least that is my experience when I come up with something. The problem is that some people get degrees by choice of multiple answers with a circular sweep of a pencil to make a dot, first principles don't matter diddly as it is in a book written just like that.. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |