![]() |
Baluns?
|
Baluns?
|
Baluns?
|
Baluns?
|
Common and Differential Modalities
Richard Clark wrote:
... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC By all means, proceed. However, fair warning, I stopped reading any posts, by you, long ago ... I find that all I can muster is caustic comments from here on out ... Regards, JS -- It is like a nightmare where the public servants are the people which the police are supposed to protect us from! |
Baluns?
|
Common and Differential Modalities
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:49:55 -0700, John Smith
wrote: My gawd, inappropriately addressed - but accepted nonetheless. an idiot which who takes a hundrend hundred sentences to say write a simple point is little better than an idiot which who cannot even generate write one sentence! Only a little better? Do you have a sentence, or is this another obscure sentiment? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Baluns?
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message 36... Do your prayers make any difference, they really don't, because God knew you were going to pray, and he knew his response. You had no choice. You did what you did because God made you do it that way. This of course means that God knows the predestination of every person he created, which means that he knew that he was knowingly condemming a whole lot of people to an eternity of torture. I picked up on these and other inconsistencies in the early 1970s. I've been an atheist ever since. I wish some few atheists weren't such activists about it, though. It gives us bad PR and turns atheism into a religion. |
Common and Differential Modalities
wrote in message ... On Sep 3, 10:54 pm, "Jerry" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sep 3, 3:59 pm, Richard Clark wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:26:26 -0700 (PDT), wrote: In a perfect situation, with a balanced feedline, the only kind of current and voltage you have IS common mode! This statement above contains a serious error of perception while trying to inhabit the debate over BalUns - and it probably corrupts that topic too. First - a circuit has at a minimum two conductors extending from a source. A circuit by its nature is circular: for every charge carrier that enters it, one must exit it. Continuity is a necessary condition for a circuit. No continuity, no conduction, hence an "Open Circuit." Second - those two conductors, if viewed at a remote point where they are joined, have equal and opposite paths of current conduction - to and from that point. This is from Kirchoff's law of currents. Third - this is called Differential Mode current in anticipation of a common modality. Fourth - if that remote point of connection is replaced with a load, there is a voltage across that load characterized by both the unaltered directions of current, and its now altered magnitude of current. Fifth - this is called Differential Mode voltage in anticipation of a common modality. This completes the discussion of the Differential Mode. If we expand upon this simple model of a source, two wires, and a load and put it into the context of life as we know it; then the circuit operates in the proximity of ground. By convention, ground is called Common. Ground, by convention is an infinite sink of charge of infinite extent. Hence as a conductor, it is available everywhere - Common. This ground may have either deliberate or accidental conductive relationships to the Differential Circuit. First - the linkage of ground to the differential circuit can be through an Ohmic path, or by an inductive path, or by a capacitive path. To support conduction, the circuit must contain two conductive paths to ground through any combination of these linkages, and that path must be complete. The apparent source driving conduction through that path will be a combination of the differential source and the differential load as each will have some relationship to ground. Second - those two conductive paths, if viewed at a remote point where they are joined, have equal and opposite paths of current conduction - to and from that point. This is from Kirchoff's law of currents. Third - this is called Common Mode current. Fourth - as the differential circuit is original and establishes both the source and the load; then through the introduction of ground, this Common Mode current is mixed with the original Differential Current and analysis must be performed by substitutions to separate them. Fifth - the apparent source presents the Common Mode voltage. This completes the discussion of Common Mode. The applications of a choke to either circuit is commonplace to control each mode's current. It would appear through the context of discussion in other threads that there is some confusion in what is being choked, and how a choke is properly applied is confounded by that confusion. It follows that if the transmission line from the source to load suffers from Common Mode currents, that this must be due to a Common Mode voltage gradient extending from the source to the load. If either lead of that transmission line pair were choked, this would disrupt the Differential Mode. If both leads of the transmission line pair were independently choked, this would only double the disruption. However, if both leads were choked in parallel (both lines either coiled as a pair rather than individually, or both lines penetrate a lossy core) then their fields would be contained between them in the Differential Mode, but their Common Mode path (they both share equal conduction in the same direction due to the Common Mode voltage gradient) will be snubbed. Some BalUns employ these techniques - some don't. BalUns fail by the degree that they don't when Common Mode, as a problem, is injected into the circuit through imbalances. As balance in the proximity of earth and many confounding nearby structures is a forgone failure, choking is a practical necessity for correct BalUn performance. Any issues of BalUn heatings are proof of this choking necessity, and further proof of the demand for additional choking at that point (and frequently elsewhere at wavelength relationships along the affected line). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Let me put it this way (again very simplifed): How do you explain a residential 208V power source where you have 120 V from line 1 and line 2 to ground but 240V with respect to each other. You 240V household appliances operate this way. Ecept for the fact that the lines are 120 degrees out of phase phase (insread of 180 because we use a delta system instead of Y, but this is not that important for this discussion) this is nearly a BALANCED feed, where lines 1 and 2 degrees out of phase at 60 Hz and the voltage of interest is the summation of the two lines. Nearly every home in the USA operates this way. In Europe, 240 V is usually obtained by the voltage difference between line 1 (240V) and earth (0V). That is an unbalanced feed. You can insert a 1:1 isolation transformer using the European system at the input and create the balanced USA system at the output by drawing +120 and -120 at from the output windings assigning imaginary isolated earth at centertap. The isolated ground CANNOT conduct tio real ground if the winding to winding impedance is infinity. Basically, hams' 1:1 baluns do much the same thing: They isolate the real ground as such and prevent currents from flowing down the input ground shield. On this ng in a short space I cannot think of a simpler way to express this although I expect to see many statements (you can't equate 60Hz to RF!). Yes you can; a transformer operates as a transformer in the same wayat any frequency providing you design it properly for the frequency of interest. This subject is not nearly so complicated as some in this group makes it out to be and the topic certainly does not rate articles in amateur publications any more than basic application of ohm's law does. Hi Dfinn I realize that you have asked this question to Richard, who is far better prepared to answer than I am. But, it seems that you are confused about how two sine waves add. Maybe I am wrong, and you do know how two sine wave voltages generated at different times and are connected in series combine to being other than 180 degrees from terminal to terminal. All the 208 power lines I am familiar with *are* 208 from terminal to terminal when each leg is 120 "terminal to center". Where did you get the "240"? Jerry KD6JDJ- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I tried to explain this one failure in my model; it is truely of phase difference of 120 degree, thus you get only 240/SQRT(3) = 208 RMC when measuring from phase 1 relative to phase 2. The cure is to imagine a Y network instead of a delta network; it is much easier to conceptualize but they are not used so much in the US anymore Hi Dfinn Where do you measure voltages on any two terminals to get a 120 degree phase reading in a three phase system? How do you divide 240 by the square root of 3 and get 208? Jerry KD6JDJ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com