Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... A sloper antenna when resonant produces more gain than a vertical dipole resonant at the same frequency. True or false? prove it Gain in which direction? True AND False - Prove otherwise. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 13, 9:03*pm, "Hal Rosser" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message ... A sloper antenna when resonant produces more gain than a vertical dipole resonant at the same frequency. True or false? prove it Gain in which direction? True AND False - Prove otherwise. Sometimes you just have to do it for yourself instead of the use of free speech where there is no accountability |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
... Sometimes you just have to do it for yourself instead of the use of free speech where there is no accountability We have a few words to describe such, here in America (well, real Americans do anyway): "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me." -- source unknown. It dates back to about the time of our forefathers drafting of the constitution, if not well before ... IMHO, it could not be said better. Regards, JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 2:24*pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: ... Sometimes you just have to do it for yourself instead of the use of free speech where there is no accountability We have a few words to describe such, here in America (well, real Americans do anyway): "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me." -- source unknown. It dates back to about the time of our forefathers drafting of the constitution, if not well before ... IMHO, it could not be said better. Regards, JS JS I am just trying to explain physics and radiation is simple terms for the layman this does lead to mis characterizations in favor of clarity. There is an example of garbled language submitted earlier today to give the impression of greatness in stature. A three dimension field was explained where it provided gain. The person went into uneadded information to decribe something like it was a new revalation of science where in fact it is totally meaningless with respect to related context. Sure I am not the best guy in explaining things as with my spelling but I see no pleasure of infering the silliness of another person by inflating my own significance by the use of a loose mouth, Apparently others do ! When the new patent comes out I expect the same comments that I have heard in the past I knew that! everybody knows that. What use is it etc Look to the past and you will see the outlines of the future It would thrill me to bits if I was given an example where mathematics proved me wrong as it would give me a reason to re evaluate things a process I enjoy but that is not to be Best regards I have a old mercedes in storage and my daughter has a need for a car and has asked for it so I have to replaces the deisel lines as they have probably swelled and some other things. I think it is a bit of cheek but then it will be nice to see it on the road again My present deisel that I drive of the same manufacturer she says she doesn't like.......Women come from Venus no less Art Unwin KB9MZ.......xg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Internal actions of a radiator | Antenna | |||
Circuitry of a radiator | Antenna | |||
EZNEC Model of a Tilted Half Rhombic Antenna | Antenna | |||
Is it possible to create a directional VLF radiator? | General | |||
need to change radiator size | Antenna |