Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 12:22*pm, "Frank" wrote:
These were shore based installations probably in Hawaii or some island. With respect to resonance, moving away from such as well as changing from 15 degrees (Frank's 30 degrees divided by two) would provide a pattern of distinct advantage which the navy is constantly looking for For a whip tipped at an angle of 15 degrees can provide a forward pattern of gain which can be a big deal I anticipate that the navy will gyrate towards helical design where the addition of a magnetic field will give a pattern of choice together with resonance the size of a shoebox to reduce the number of antennas on board. Thanks for the info, it certainly was not silly As an aside the 15 degrees is the same as found empirically by Kraus in the pitch angle of a helical, another example of the inclusion of the weak force in a system in equilibrium ! My original model was for a dipole tilted 45 degrees. *The following analysis is for a 35 ft ground mounted monopole with thirty-six 40 ft radials buried 1" below an average ground of: conductivity 5 mS/m, and relative permittivity 13. *It is noted that the tilted monopole has a slight gain opposite to the direction of tilt. *The following comparison is made in the direction of maximum gain. *The F/B ratio is nominally 0.2 db, and the gain 0.2 db at lower angles. *The measurement was made on 7.2 MHz, and the input impedance 45 + j 47 ohms. Take off Angle * * * *Vertical * * * * * *15 deg tilt (degrees) * * * * * * * Gain (dbi) * * * * * Gain (dbi) 10 * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-2.5 * * * * * * * * * *-2.3 20 * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-0.2 * * * * * * * * * *0 30 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *0 * * * * * * * * * * * +0.3 40 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -0.8 * * * * * * * * *-0.3 50 * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-2.3 * * * * * * * * * -1.5 60 * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-4.6 * * * * * * * * * -3.3 70 * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-8.0 * * * * * * * * * -5.9 80 * * * * * * * * * * * * * -14.0 * * * * * * * * *-9.3 90 * * * * * * * * * *Deep null * * * * * * * * * -13.4 CM Monopole with buried radial system. CE GW 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 -0.083 0.0026708 GW 37 39 0 1 -0.083 0 40 -0.083 0.0026708 GR 1 36 GS 0 0 0.304800 GE -1 -1 0 GN 2 0 0 0 13.0000 0.0050 FR 0 1 0 0 7.2 0.01 LD 5 0 0 0 5.8001E7 WG monopole_36.NGF EN CM 36 Radial Read NGF CE GF 0 monopole_36.NGF GW 73 35 0 9.0587 33.807 0 0 0 0.002671 GS 0 0 0.304800 GE 0 0 0 EX 0 73 35 0 6349.474358 0.00000 LD 5 0 0 0 5.8001E7 RP 0 181 1 1000 -90 270 1.00000 1.00000 EN 73, *Frank Frank I am not familiar with your programming but the weak force is just that....weak It is for that reason the Yagi coupling of elements provides a good estimate with easy structure. For long distance accurracy is not a big deal but for measuring and for medical applications it is. Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Internal actions of a radiator | Antenna | |||
Circuitry of a radiator | Antenna | |||
EZNEC Model of a Tilted Half Rhombic Antenna | Antenna | |||
Is it possible to create a directional VLF radiator? | General | |||
need to change radiator size | Antenna |