| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 14, 10:26*pm, John Smith wrote:
wrote: ... You've just unvailed the dirty secret that antennas don't work in space and that all the so called communications with Appolo, Pioneer, Mir, ISS, the shuttle and all telecommunications satellites is faked. Now you had better be on the watch for the black helicopters for reveling this. No. *But the new pictures of light-waves do suggest they travel a medium which exists, EVEN, in space, and yet, unseen to-date, and end up "striking" the antenna(s) in question ... but then, most have always accepted waves need a "medium" to propagate on/in ... but then--assign it the name "either" and grown men cower in the shadows, in fear! *ROFLOL Regards, JS John the problem as I see it is how the magnetic field is bestowed on a unbound particle that is not rejected by the Earth"s magnetic field but allowed to ecape from the Sun's magnetic field .. It is this I have no explanation for and despite all reference to garbage nobody can supply the true creation of radiation. More light needs to be shed on the subject of space. to determine what one calls garbage because of a compressed field of knoweledge where another without those constraints see it as a treasure. I have a strong suspicion that scientists have assigned diiferent names based on the theory assigned to one many of which there is no evidence of their existance Best regards Art |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
| Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
| Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna | |||