Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to share with you one problem that I have on the above subject
When placing a yagi in free space the computor programs supply a gain figure where according to my thinking the root cause for ejection is the intersection of two magnetic field.How this happens with a yagi is a matter of conjecture. Any pointers? Performing the same with an arrangement in equilibhrium there is no gravity and yet gain is shown. This leads to four posabilities ! in the absence of levitation ejection is provided by the sliding of the charges at the radiator ends as with corona in a vacuum. Problem no spin applied 2 With a coupled antenna, yagi there exists two magnetic fields that intersect where the charges again because of the absence of equilibrium the charge again slides off the end Problem again no spin applied 3 The programs have been modified from inception where the only rules involved were Maxwell's laws which was then modified to correllate with pre conceived known facts 4 The concept of initial reliance on equilibrium as preached by the masters is incorrect and my reasoning is in error I do not know the answer as I am not skilled with respect to the algerythms used but the unknown can supply ammunition for loose mouths until it is resolved One thing is certain, Gauss states that static particles cannot radiate in free space as there is no exchange of flux and Maxwell includes the vector associated with the weak force where gravity is non existent or zero !. Best regards Art |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
One thing is certain, Gauss states that static particles cannot radiate in free space as there is no exchange of flux and Maxwell includes the vector associated with the weak force where gravity is non existent or zero !. Best regards Art You've just unvailed the dirty secret that antennas don't work in space and that all the so called communications with Appolo, Pioneer, Mir, ISS, the shuttle and all telecommunications satellites is faked. Now you had better be on the watch for the black helicopters for reveling this. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 11:26*pm, John Smith wrote:
No. *But the new pictures of light-waves do suggest they travel a medium which exists, EVEN, in space, and yet, unseen to-date, and end up "striking" the antenna(s) in question ... but then, most have always accepted waves need a "medium" to propagate on/in ... but then--assign it the name "either" and grown men cower in the shadows, in fear! *ROFLOL Regards, JS Egad, another senility eruption. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: Egad, another senility eruption. Quoting "Alpha and Omega", by Charles Seife: "Empty space is an incredibly complex substance, ... Quantum physicists are forced to conclude that the vacuum isn't truly empty. It is seething with particles and energy." "Casimir effect: The ability of the ZERO-POINT ENERGY, the particles constantly winking in and out of existence, to exert a force. Predicted by Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir, the Casimir effect has been measured." Reckon all quantum physicists are senile? Aye Captain. Those words move evermore towards undeniable, each and everyday ... the question? A very valid one ... Warm regards, JS |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 15, 8:01*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: Egad, another senility eruption. Quoting "Alpha and Omega", by Charles Seife: "Empty space is an incredibly complex substance, ... Quantum physicists are forced to conclude that the vacuum isn't truly empty. It is seething with particles and energy." "Casimir effect: The ability of the ZERO-POINT ENERGY, the particles constantly winking in and out of existence, to exert a force. Predicted by Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir, the Casimir effect has been measured." Reckon all quantum physicists are senile? -- 73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com I reckon most are not although some may be. However, Seif is currently an associate professor in New York University's Journalism Department with a Masters in Math. He is nowhere near the caliber of a quantum physicist which would render your point moot, would it not? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 10:26*pm, John Smith wrote:
wrote: ... You've just unvailed the dirty secret that antennas don't work in space and that all the so called communications with Appolo, Pioneer, Mir, ISS, the shuttle and all telecommunications satellites is faked. Now you had better be on the watch for the black helicopters for reveling this. No. *But the new pictures of light-waves do suggest they travel a medium which exists, EVEN, in space, and yet, unseen to-date, and end up "striking" the antenna(s) in question ... but then, most have always accepted waves need a "medium" to propagate on/in ... but then--assign it the name "either" and grown men cower in the shadows, in fear! *ROFLOL Regards, JS John the problem as I see it is how the magnetic field is bestowed on a unbound particle that is not rejected by the Earth"s magnetic field but allowed to ecape from the Sun's magnetic field .. It is this I have no explanation for and despite all reference to garbage nobody can supply the true creation of radiation. More light needs to be shed on the subject of space. to determine what one calls garbage because of a compressed field of knoweledge where another without those constraints see it as a treasure. I have a strong suspicion that scientists have assigned diiferent names based on the theory assigned to one many of which there is no evidence of their existance Best regards Art |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
... John the problem as I see it is how the magnetic field is bestowed on a unbound particle that is not rejected by the Earth"s magnetic field but allowed to ecape from the Sun's magnetic field . It is this I have no explanation for and despite all reference to garbage nobody can supply the true creation of radiation. More light needs to be shed on the subject of space. to determine what one calls garbage because of a compressed field of knoweledge where another without those constraints see it as a treasure. I have a strong suspicion that scientists have assigned diiferent names based on the theory assigned to one many of which there is no evidence of their existance Best regards Art There is actually a LOT in the few words above, it is deceptively stated--although, perhaps, without intention; had to really think about it a bit: I quite agree with the fact that what you refer to as "have assigned different names [to] ..." is/are at the center of what you speak, what the "either is" and what the Hadron project is about to attempt to look at, in greater detail ... indeed, it is where the "new knowledge/discoveries" are about to emerge from (if there is any chance that will happen--at all.) Hopefully, this all will end up pointing at new ways to design antennas to take advantage of "its'" (the eithers') properties. And, is an area adjacent to, in the very least, the one you are in the process of contemplating/imagining ... The earths magnetic field (indeed, any static/changing magnetic field for that matter), gravity, suns particles/emissions/etc. all depend on the "either" you place in question; when you sprinkle iron filings on a sheet of paper and position a magnet below--this is what you look at; I believe it is also what is referred to as "the weak force" (or, is intrinsically related), but talk about a misnomer! We just spin our wheels with little progress ahead ... but then Einstein even referred to it as, and I paraphrase, "un-comprehend-able!" But then, perhaps some of "these things" are just shooting bullets (particles) as some picture the "particles." One must acknowledge this, although I have come NOT to "believe it", at this point. We can't know until we really "know", and even then we may have yet to "prove" it; and, therein lies the real problem(s). For now, we must face the goons who poke fun at men and women who wonder, and dream, yet are certain "they" know SOMETHING EXISTS THERE. You are correct to focus your vision(s) towards the Hadron project ... it is at least one hope of vindication! :-( And, even if you still do not see the either as I do -- you will "come 'round!" grin Regards, JS |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
I believe it is also what is referred to as "the weak force" Magnetism is one aspect of the electromagnetic force. The "weak force" is associated with atomic nuclei. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_force -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna |