Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What, the "amazing" revelation that particles exist in space, even
though for all practicle purposes it can be treated as a vacuum? The amazing thing is that space cannot exist without those particles which provide the very structure of space itself. It seems that space is a property of matter rather than vice versa. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Theoretical absolutes don't happen as often as in the space in the head. You can't convince me that gravity or magnetic fields really require a media to travel through. Assuming there is one would be a crutch. Didn't stop us from getting people to the moon and back. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JB wrote:
... Theoretical absolutes don't happen as often as in the space in the head. You can't convince me that gravity or magnetic fields really require a media to travel through. Assuming there is one would be a crutch. Didn't stop us from getting people to the moon and back. Although not clearly stated for the "general public", isn't that exactly what the Hadron project is all about?; splitting matter down to its' smallest particle(s), and therefore, discovering the "matter" which space itself is constructed from? I mean, that is what I expect ... Regards, JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
Although not clearly stated for the "general public", isn't that exactly what the Hadron project is all about?; splitting matter down to its' smallest particle(s), and therefore, discovering the "matter" which space itself is constructed from? Stephen Hawking has predicted that CERN will not find the Higgs bosom, the only particle in the Standard Model that has not been detected. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
... Stephen Hawking has predicted that CERN will not find the Higgs bosom, the only particle in the Standard Model that has not been detected. Yep, it is pretty-much, up-for-grabs. Even the CERN project may fall short of energy levels required ... but then, you have to start somewhere. Regards, JS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JB wrote:
You can't convince me that gravity or magnetic fields really require a media to travel through. Assuming there is one would be a crutch. Didn't stop us from getting people to the moon and back. We certainly traveled through the medium of space in order to get to the moon. EM photons obviously travel through the medium of space. What you need to prove is that EM photons can travel somewhere else besides the medium of space, i.e. outside of the boundaries of the universe. (P.S. Since "media" is the plural of "medium", "a media" is improper.) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna |