Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 17th 08, 05:10 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 136
Default Equilibrium in free space

On Sep 16, 5:15*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote:
Why must there be an "it" through which TEM waves proagate? Why cannot
they propagate through nothingness?


Because the only thing that can propagate through
nothingness is nothing. That should be clear to
the most casual observer.
--
73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com


That would be true if the casual observer did not consider truly empty
space to be nothingness. I do. I do not believe that truly empty space
is "something" because to believe otherwise would be to assume that
nothingness only exists outside of our Universe... nothingness would
not "be" but we define it, so it "is". We know that TEMs can
propagate through truly empty space because TEM waves propagate
through space, some of which must be "empty" space and some of which
is "occupied". I agree that some locii of space, but not all, are
characterized by a wide variety of quantum particles, perhaps only
some of which actually occupy the space associated with them. Bottom
line is that such particles are not required for TEM waves to
propagate and they are not the aether.
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 17th 08, 05:12 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 543
Default Equilibrium in free space

That would be true if the casual observer did not consider truly empty
space to be nothingness. I do.


That's obviously a logical contradiction. Space is
something. If space is there, then something is there.
If nothing is there, then space cannot possibly be
there.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


So if nothing is there, it aint nothing after all?
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 17th 08, 06:03 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Equilibrium in free space

JB wrote:
So if nothing is there, it aint nothing after all?


There is no "there" within the space of our universe
where nothing is there. Casimir effect experiments
have been run on spaces where nothing is supposed to
be. But instead of nothing, they found the quantum soup
which is the space occupied by our universe.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 17th 08, 10:00 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 543
Default Equilibrium in free space


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:
So if nothing is there, it aint nothing after all?


There is no "there" within the space of our universe
where nothing is there. Casimir effect experiments
have been run on spaces where nothing is supposed to
be. But instead of nothing, they found the quantum soup
which is the space occupied by our universe.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


Don't blame me, I never spilled any quantum soup in your space.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) Dr. Slick Antenna 183 October 2nd 20 11:44 AM
Equilibrium art Antenna 16 October 17th 07 02:27 AM
Gaussian equilibrium art Antenna 0 February 26th 07 09:54 PM
Question about free space loss ... Doug McLaren Antenna 1 November 9th 05 03:09 AM
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K Bob Bob Antenna 6 September 27th 05 06:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017