Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote: One would first have to presume to know what space is in order to stipulate the conditions for its existence. We know space exists and according to quantum physics, nothing except particles exist. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude that, if quantum physics is correct, then space must be constructed of particles albeit possibly as yet undiscovered and possibly unmeasurable particles. And with that you feel that you can claim to know what space 'is'. It must be just marvelous to be you. :-) ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna |