Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 18, 7:59*pm, John Smith wrote:
wrote: [stuff, stuff, and a lot more stuff] Yep, I think you are on the right path ... To summarize Cecil: * "Yep, even the astronaut floating in space cannot empty his bucket! And, worse than that, no one has ever even seen an empty bucket! Speculations to what an empty bucket would look like should be able to be done, however." If you are out there, Cecil, feel free to correct me ... *;-) Regards, JS I guess the word "empty" has no meaning anymore. Why, an astronaut in space cannot even carry an empty bucket. I'm sure you would agree that we should just strike the word from the Webster and Oxford dictionaries because you, who are immersed in advanced scientific thought, are convinced that a state of emptiness anywhere in the universe is impossible. I am truly humbled by your profound reasoning which I know would not be possible without that little extra touch of senility that releases you from the confining boundaries of logic. I assume that the absence of a correction by Mr. Cecil will indicate his agreement with your tripe. I might also mention that you need not reach out to Mr. Cecil to validate your bizzare pronouncements. Get some self-confidence in your statements Johhny, grow a spine! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna |