Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
John Smith wrote: This is why some are speculating we don't have our antennas "correct" and the formulas we design them with are lacking ... Maybe we should fire up our modulated gravity wave and entangled particle receivers. Cecil: I am just telling you what I see suggested in his papers, lectures and talks (not to mention a whole slew of others chiming in along the way) .... and, of course, even Einstein himself found it, almost, unbelievable! Indeed, he made a direct comment to this (not before me right now, will quote it later.) But, yes, although "the how we will do this" is much like space/structure/ether--at this point, it requires a wee-bit of faith ... Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna |