LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 20th 08, 03:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default Equilibrium in free space

Cecil Moore wrote:
John Smith wrote:
This is why some are speculating we don't have our antennas "correct"
and the formulas we design them with are lacking ...


Maybe we should fire up our modulated gravity wave
and entangled particle receivers.


Cecil:

I am just telling you what I see suggested in his papers, lectures and
talks (not to mention a whole slew of others chiming in along the way)
.... and, of course, even Einstein himself found it, almost,
unbelievable! Indeed, he made a direct comment to this (not before me
right now, will quote it later.)

But, yes, although "the how we will do this" is much like
space/structure/ether--at this point, it requires a wee-bit of faith ...

Regards,
JS
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) Dr. Slick Antenna 183 October 2nd 20 10:44 AM
Equilibrium art Antenna 16 October 17th 07 01:27 AM
Gaussian equilibrium art Antenna 0 February 26th 07 08:54 PM
Question about free space loss ... Doug McLaren Antenna 1 November 9th 05 02:09 AM
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K Bob Bob Antenna 6 September 27th 05 05:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017