|
small antennas
Art Unwin wrote:
... John, I have not read anything over the last two years regarding the M.O.M / NEC Can you give me a smigeon of information of what is being said of such programs? There was mention of such in a ARRL compendium a few years back that made mention of the assumption made on the continuity of an applied sine wave which conflicts I believe with the Tank Circuit equivalent. And ofcourse some programs do better with respect to proximity effect better than others, but I have never seen anything of major content. I do know that all four forces of the standard model are included in such programs however they are rarely utelised since they are not really understood in the present state of the art. Regards Art Art: Actually, Roy, or one (or all the hams) engaged in writing an interface to the NEC engine (MMANA-GAL and 'those guys' -- do an internet search, their emails are readily available), which frees us from having to enter the actual numerical data into a text file, would be much better gurus ... As you know, I am much more interested it what we can't see, at the moment -- the either ... Art, I have as many questions as you ... Regards, JS |
small antennas
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:13:27 -0700, John Smith
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: And you have something intelligent to say? It would have to improve over your gumming through NEC engine (at least the one I use and have the source code to), it does have a bit of what you call "voodoo science" Voodoo science exists within the NEC code Sorry Brett, gumming repetition does not prove an idea you already allowed as being a dead and embraceable disgust. You clearly don't have any idea how to progress beyond incantation of trolling prosodies. To your credit, no one expects originality from you. After all, that is the point of your (self-supposed) anonymity (an ironic joke I enjoy). You could as easily be Sara luxuriating in the flush of your TV debate victory (complete with your aw-shucksisms)! Well, let me see here, I mean, I want to give you all due respect, and all that ... No you don't. This maudlin appeal is weak tea, save it for Authur who shares your disability in lack of originality. I do applaud the parade of the lame and lazy excuses you two manage to bluff up in the guise of outrage. What a hoot! Insisting others to prove your claims has to rank up there on the honor roll of welfare queens. If the Congress had a bailout for ineptitude (and it has been fairly proven they do), they would have granted you earmarks for your mutual admiration society diary entries. You guys scribble out those tear stained pages like they earn tax credits. Weep on! The election cycle still has 30 days of promises to be made to the technically indigent. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
small antennas
Richard,
Calling people 'name' here is fairly common place. But making comparison to politician is just plain nasty! - 'Doc |
small antennas
|
small antennas
|
small antennas
Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:13:27 -0700, John Smith wrote: Richard Clark wrote: And you have something intelligent to say? It would have to improve over your gumming through NEC engine (at least the one I use and have the source code to), it does have a bit of what you call "voodoo science" Voodoo science exists within the NEC code Sorry Brett, gumming repetition does not prove an idea you already allowed as being a dead and embraceable disgust. You clearly don't have any idea how to progress beyond incantation of trolling prosodies. To your credit, no one expects originality from you. After all, that is the point of your (self-supposed) anonymity (an ironic joke I enjoy). You could as easily be Sara luxuriating in the flush of your TV debate victory (complete with your aw-shucksisms)! Well, let me see here, I mean, I want to give you all due respect, and all that ... No you don't. This maudlin appeal is weak tea, save it for Authur who shares your disability in lack of originality. I do applaud the parade of the lame and lazy excuses you two manage to bluff up in the guise of outrage. What a hoot! Insisting others to prove your claims has to rank up there on the honor roll of welfare queens. If the Congress had a bailout for ineptitude (and it has been fairly proven they do), they would have granted you earmarks for your mutual admiration society diary entries. You guys scribble out those tear stained pages like they earn tax credits. Weep on! The election cycle still has 30 days of promises to be made to the technically indigent. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC OK. I have been kind, actually. Really? You just don't matter ... I have suggested it in my text to you, consider my text summarized with the simple statement. Besides, you are a long-winded-blow-hard ... you remind me of the guy who I just walk away from my rig, come back ten minutes later, with a cup of coffee, and wait a long time for him to finish ... a long wait, most likely ... :-( Regards, JS |
small antennas
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:36:36 -0700, John Smith
wrote: OK. I have been kind, actually. Really? You just don't matter ... Boy, self contradiction in the space of a breath. That, or we are into parsing. What kind have you been? Talk about gassing on, the two of you could be the solution to the energy crisis if we could just get you guys off the endangered wheezers list. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
small antennas
Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:36:36 -0700, John Smith wrote: OK. I have been kind, actually. Really? You just don't matter ... Boy, self contradiction in the space of a breath. That, or we are into parsing. What kind have you been? Talk about gassing on, the two of you could be the solution to the energy crisis if we could just get you guys off the endangered wheezers list. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC I hope you feel you have made your point; I am satisfied with the forum you have given me to present mine ... Regards, JS |
small antennas
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:02:49 -0700, John Smith
wrote: I hope you feel you have made your point; I am satisfied with the forum you have given me to present mine ... The instructions for bailing out in a parachute suggests you pull the ripcord BEFORE you hit the ground. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
small antennas
Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:02:49 -0700, John Smith wrote: I hope you feel you have made your point; I am satisfied with the forum you have given me to present mine ... The instructions for bailing out in a parachute suggests you pull the ripcord BEFORE you hit the ground. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Richard: Look out the door of your plane ... it never left ground ... Regards, JS |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com