Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rectifier wrote:
... No, actually, a little fella named Albert Einstein made it up. An electron and a positron have mass. When they come together and annihilate, they turn into pure energy (two 511 KeV photons travelling in opposite directions if I remember right), which has no mass. That's what E=MC^2 predicted; and that's what happens in certain radioactive decays all the time. Positrons get produced by the deceleration of neutrons which come too close to the nucleus of an atom with large mass. They then annihilate when coming close to an electron. This is just one example. ... Actually, we only wish things were/are that simplistic. There is then "the other story" (hey, did I just see Paul Harvey in here?) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass-energy_equivalence Time and movement are very much in play, as are "kinetic energy factors" .... in a nutshell, mass to energy is much "easier" process than energy to mass -- and, certainly, much easier to compute/define/determine. Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Equilibrium in free space | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna |