On Sep 16, 4:23*pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
... The point where you begin
is Newtons laws, if they are in error then so am I
I doubt if you will find anything that definitely proves that he is
wrong.If a professor does not know what I have stated he should be
nfired ...
Art

Well, I certainly don't know about all that ...

But, if my understanding is correct, newtons laws begin to "fall apart"
with very small particles ... and indeed, the ether (eather, aether --
sometimes I make a typo and type it as "either") is composed of such ...

I am sure, I am least correct at the quantum level ... wink

Regards,
JS

That was ruled out when it was determined that Neutrons were not
without mass !

Art Unwin wrote:

...
That was ruled out when it was determined that Neutrons were not
without mass !

Hmmm ... actually, how can anything "really" be without "mass", isn't
energy just a "form of mass" and "vice versa?" I mean, the equations
certainly imply this ...

I mean really, when we deal with particles the size of photons and below
.... aren't they "melding" into the same "thingys" grin ... and,
perhaps my data is old ... I don't think "newton does quantum", but he
might have a brother by the same name ... ;-)

Regards,
JS