| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 16, 4:23*pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: ... The point where you begin is Newtons laws, if they are in error then so am I I doubt if you will find anything that definitely proves that he is wrong.If a professor does not know what I have stated he should be nfired ... Art Well, I certainly don't know about all that ... But, if my understanding is correct, newtons laws begin to "fall apart" with very small particles ... and indeed, the ether (eather, aether -- sometimes I make a typo and type it as "either") is composed of such ... I am sure, I am least correct at the quantum level ... wink Regards, JS That was ruled out when it was determined that Neutrons were not without mass ! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Equilibrium in free space | Antenna | |||
| Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||