Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 4:06*pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: ... Radiation has no mass? You just made that up Yes, that would seem to break the law of "'E' equals mc squared", and its' opposite, counterpart ... I mean, if you really think about it ... ;-) Regards, JS John, the danger in using mc squared is that it has not stood the test of time. I have difficulty with it as the motion of an observer acheiving the speed of light seems like standing on a sand spar waiting for the tide to come in. Same goes with Feynman diagrams as it just replaces an unknown with another unknown! Are these both emporers with no clothes surrounded by Lemmings? Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Equilibrium in free space | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna |