Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:49:04 +0000, Dave wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: Is there a standard notation or style for arithmetic and exponentiation for usenet posting? I've been switching around using different styles almost at random over the years. For exponents (HTML superscripts) some browsers convert c^2 to csup2/sup HTML. That's the convention I use for exponents. Why don't you two get a room? This bull**** has nothing to do with ham radio. However, maybe if we ionized your hot air we could bounce some 70 cm off the cloud. I've always suspected that some hams hated math and other technical subjects. While it is conceivable that you could build a ham antenna without using math, I don't think the results would be optimal. There are also those that advocate converting ham radio from a technical hobby, to a sport, where the technical aspects are diminished to the point of extinction, and the operational exercises of contesting, DX, CW, and rag chewing are predominant. No math required. Perhaps the FCC could balkanize the ham bands into technical and non-technical sub-bands, where the clueless and those that still design, calculate, and build their own equipment can be seperated for their own safety. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Equilibrium in free space | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna |