| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
A vetor diagram in my mind evolves around Newtons laws
All forces (vectors) forces when summed must equal zero. Whether their is a triange or a polygon of forces it always leaves a gap whuch thus provides a vector required to make he arrangement equal zero and in a state of equilibrium. The masters always followed this aproach to determine if equilibrium was present by vectorizing all the forces known within a arbitrary border. They always came up with an unclosed vector arrangement even tho it met the requirements of equilibrium. So all filled in the gap o arrive at the starting point and labelled this unknown vector that they were forced to provide as the weak force required for equilibrium to satisfy Newtons law. Regards Art I think you are confusing the "Weak force", resposible for "Beta decay" in radio-active materials. The following web site explains the work of Enrico Fermi in this area: http://atomic-molecular-optical-phys...the_weak_force While it is not unreasonable to consider Newtonian mechanics in an explanation of what hapens within a conductor, there is no missing force involved. Computation of the electric and magnetic fields in the vicinity of a conductor involve manipulation of the "Vector magnetic potential"; as in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_vector_potential Frank |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Equilibrium in free space | Antenna | |||
| Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||