Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JB" wrote in message news:uSDBk.486$UB3.159@trnddc07... I took the General Radiotelephone Operator's License exam in 1981, just after it went into effect. However, they were still giving the old 2nd class exam, which was mostly about tube technology and which shared nothing in common with the Extra Class amateur exam of the time. I did 2nd Phone in the late 70's and there was tube, transistor, RTL and TTL logic theory, and 'complete the schematic' type questions but less of that and more general types of engineering and circuit theory, AC/DC theory, RF and transmission lines and most of it involving Electronic Math. Trig, Vectors, no Smith charts or Calculus. Very little of it had anything to do with tubes specifically. The rest was FCC parts. It was said at the time, that it was more like the Advanced Ham ticket. I got my Advanced a year or two before, and I agree the technology level was equivalent and it was about 200 questions or so. Later when I did the Extra, (90's) there were questions well beyond the 2nd Phone but only 25 of them! The code test and the noise floor equations made me strain. I wish the bandwidth and modulation questions were on the Technician class test though. ------------ Yep, the solid state and basic computer theory were there too, but I was surprised that they used a schematic of an RF tube amp for diagnostics purposes. I was sure that they were going to use solid state equipment for diagnosis. I was wrong. As it turned out, tubes are always easier for me to figure out, so it ended up being a plus for me. The Advanced Class amateur license test was definitely the pinnacle of amateur radio technical testing, but I didn't feel it was up to the 2nd Phone test that I took for the General. In fact, I even found a few mistakes in the Advanced test. The Extra Class test (I took it in 1985) did include a question or two that required some trig, but I figured out the answer in my head before finishing the equation. It was obvious that the conjugate impedance was going to be capacitive. There was only one answer with a -j, so it was obvious that that would be the correct answer. Ed, NM2K |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The Extra Class test (I took it in 1985) did include a question or two that required some trig, but I figured out the answer in my head before finishing the equation. It was obvious that the conjugate impedance was going to be capacitive. There was only one answer with a -j, so it was obvious that that would be the correct answer. Ed, NM2K I picked up on that too. If you didn't know what was going on there, you would be left drudging through a math problem. The thing about Trig was having to memorize all the substitutions in order to poke the problem into a manageable calculation, or you wind up losing precision. If that happens, you wont have the clear cut answer for the multiple guess. In some ways I miss tube equipment. Now I have to deal with surface mount technology. Even for a resistor, I risk putting a soldering iron up my nose while squinting through a loupe. I just dread the idea of replacing a chip with 100 legs or more. In the 70's you had to know tubes and everything else too because there was so much transition. Ham Radio magazine was my best friend, and it was an opportunity to learn the discrete versions of complex stuff like synthesizers and various issues that had to be overcome. It's all easier now. If you can figure out what a controller is supposed to do, all you have to do is make sure the rest of the components can comply. But there is so much offshore cheap junk now that almost everything is worthless to fix but cheap to modify. Except for industrial controls and things like that. But now customers are just trained to throw stuff away on a bigger scale. I get the idea that We as American citizens are not allowed to know technology any more. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JB wrote:
In some ways I miss tube equipment. Now I have to deal with surface mount technology. Even for a resistor, I risk putting a soldering iron up my nose while squinting through a loupe. I just dread the idea of replacing a chip with 100 legs or more. These things are the best. They are stereo so you get depth perception. They are cheap and the optics are very good. I can read the numbers on parts the size of a grain of salt and I'm 59 years old. I have no SMT dread. http://www.mageyes.com/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But now customers are just
trained to throw stuff away on a bigger scale. I get the idea that We as American citizens are not allowed to know technology any more. Its not the technology... its the economics. Why in the world would a consumer want to more in labor charges for a sophisticated electronics product that cost less to replace than repair? Ed K7AAT |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 22, 10:32*am, "JB" wrote:
The Extra Class test (I took it in 1985) did include a question or two that required some trig, but I figured out the answer in my head before finishing the equation. It was obvious that the conjugate impedance was going to be capacitive. There was only one answer with a -j, so it was obvious that that would be the correct answer. Ed, NM2K I picked up on that too. *If you didn't know what was going on there, you would be left drudging through a math problem. The thing about Trig was having to memorize all the substitutions in order to poke the problem into a manageable calculation, or you wind up losing precision. *If that happens, you wont have the clear cut answer for the multiple guess. In some ways I miss tube equipment. *Now I have to deal with surface mount technology. *Even for a resistor, I risk putting a soldering iron up my nose while squinting through a loupe. *I just dread the idea of replacing a chip with 100 legs or more. *In the 70's you had to know tubes and everything else too because there was so much transition. *Ham Radio magazine was my best friend, and it was an opportunity to learn the discrete versions of complex stuff like synthesizers and various issues that had to be overcome. It's all easier now. *If you can figure out what a controller is supposed to do, all you have to do is make sure the rest of the components can comply.. But there is so much offshore cheap junk now that almost everything is worthless to fix but cheap to modify. *Except for industrial controls and things like that. *But now customers are just trained to throw stuff away on a bigger scale. *I get the idea that We as American citizens are not allowed to know technology any more. I had to take a test for the FAA once that the prep material took you through all kinds of cr stuff that I studied for two months. When I finally took the BIG test that my job depended on it was ALL about decibles. The two hour 50 question test took me twenty minutes and I never picked up my calculator. About all you had to know was 1db was 20% 3db doubled or halved and every 10db was 10 times and you pick the multiple guess answer. I remember the guy giving the test thought I had given up and turned the test in after only 20 minutes .He certainly was surprised when he found I ACED it.The people that failed it all knew what they were doing They just got bogged down in the crank and grind of the math. Jimmie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ham License | General | |||
Ham License | Policy | |||
Ham License | Policy | |||
Ham License | Policy | |||
Getting A Ham License | Policy |