Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would anybody who owns Eico model 710 GDO be willing to supply coil
data (diameter, length, No. of turns, wire diameter) so that I could duplicate the coils? I bought the coil-less 710 at the fleamarket and cannot find the coil set. I am mainly interested in the 2.9-7,5 and 7.5-18 MHz ranges. Or maybe a close-up photo with a ruler laying next to the coils would be enough. 73, Rich OK8RF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, charrid wrote:
Would anybody who owns Eico model 710 GDO be willing to supply coil data (diameter, length, No. of turns, wire diameter) so that I could duplicate the coils? I bought the coil-less 710 at the fleamarket and cannot find the coil set. I am mainly interested in the 2.9-7,5 and 7.5-18 MHz ranges. Or maybe a close-up photo with a ruler laying next to the coils would be enough. 73, Rich OK8RF The coils are bound to have so many turns that they will be hard to count, unless someone actually unwound them. Open it up, see if you can figure the capacitance of the variable capacitor (or maybe there's a schematic somewhere that provides that information?), and then use the equations to figure out the needed inductance and then the number of turns to make that value of inductance. Then you can use any size coil form, just so long as you can rig it to fit whatever the GDO is using for the coils to plug into. Wind some extra turns, and then remove them if necessary (since it's easier to remove than add turns). It won't be exact, but any GDO dial is fairly vague. The inherent capacitance of the coil will come into play, so you can decide whether it's best to have the GDO dial match at the high end or the low end. Thirty years ago there was an article in "73" about revamping a GDO, I think he solid-stated it but can't remember, but he didn't have a coil set either and described the process he went through to give it a set of coils. I think it was radical surgery though, I seem to recall that he even changed the jacks used for the coils. He took the easy way out, providing a jack to feed a frequency counter so the original dial was relatively unimportant. Michael VE2BVW |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
... Michael VE2BVW So then, start out with the highest frequency coil--this one you should be able to count the turns on. Then, look at then next, wind it, test it, and adjust turns so that in conforms to the expected frequency coverage of the "next band." Then, sit down with your calculator and "predict" the next ... adjust your calculations and predict/compute the next ... etc.--repeat as necessary ... Logic ... it pays off in the long run, is usable across all disciplines ... Regards, JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:14:21 -0700 (PDT), charrid
wrote: Would anybody who owns Eico model 710 GDO be willing to supply coil data (diameter, length, No. of turns, wire diameter) so that I could duplicate the coils? Yech, tubes. I have several Heathkit grid dip meters, but no Eico. This may help: http://www.qsl.net/n4xy/GDO_EICO.html The photo shows one coil, which should give you an idea as to the general size and construction of the coil. The photo of the Eico 710-A looks very much like one of my Heathkits (buried somewhere). Do you have a 710 or a 710-A. There's a huge difference. I bought the coil-less 710 at the fleamarket and cannot find the coil set. I am mainly interested in the 2.9-7,5 and 7.5-18 MHz ranges. Or maybe a close-up photo with a ruler laying next to the coils would be enough. 73, Rich OK8RF Others have suggested cut-n-try which is probably good enough. As long as the coil looks roughly like the original, it should work. However, if you wanna do the math, look at the schematic and figure out the minimum and maximum capacitance on the variable tuning capacitor. Be sure to include any trimmers or padding capacitors in the tuned circuit. You know the lowest and highest frequencies from the dial. Drag out your abacus and plug the numbers into the usual LC resonant frequency equation. Solve for a value of L that will be roughly the same at both the high and low ends of the dial. You probably won't hit the exact value, but it should be close. Lots of online calculators for the inductance of solenoid wound coils. No need for an LRC meter as you can just plug it into the grid dip meter and count the frequency. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:02:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: This may help: http://www.qsl.net/n4xy/GDO_EICO.html The photo shows one coil, which should give you an idea as to the general size and construction of the coil. More photos. http://reviews.ebay.com/Eico-710-Grid-Dip-Meter-Coil-Set-protection-packing_W0QQugidZ10000000001863194?ssPageName=BUYG D:CAT:-1:SEARCH:5 Oh-oh. My Heathkit coils do not have ferrite or iron slugs. The Eico 710 coils apparently do. The coil on the left is obviously broken. Free manual for the Eico 710: http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/eico/710/ I'm too lazy to find a DejaVu decompressor, but I expect there are some instructions and diagrams of the coils in the manual. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
... Others have suggested cut-n-try which is probably good enough. As long as the coil looks roughly like the original, it should work. ... Yeah, working as a software engineer and finding I get the most money from convincing those "with money" that I am worth "some of their money" has made me aware of the value of reverse engineering--whether software or hardware--it works! But, if you have built enough "old box tube xmitters", you can almost guess the dia./turns/and-caps wink Heck, bet I could come up with a circuit using the same coils, using a fet, and saving the cost of the filament power! Indeed, if the tube uses an octal socket, in his current GDO, why not replace the tube with a fet(s)? Regards, JS |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:27:20 -0700, John Smith
wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: ... Others have suggested cut-n-try which is probably good enough. As long as the coil looks roughly like the original, it should work. ... Yeah, working as a software engineer and finding I get the most money from convincing those "with money" that I am worth "some of their money" has made me aware of the value of reverse engineering--whether software or hardware--it works! The very first think I did when starting a new product, was to do a "survey" of the competitions products. If possible, some were purchased, dissected, reverse engineered, and on one occasion, cloned. No need to reinvent the wheel when the competition has done it for you. But, if you have built enough "old box tube xmitters", you can almost guess the dia./turns/and-caps wink Heck, bet I could come up with a circuit using the same coils, using a fet, and saving the cost of the filament power! Indeed, if the tube uses an octal socket, in his current GDO, why not replace the tube with a fet(s)? Because the typical FET as a much higher transconductance (typically about 30 millisiemens versus 5 millisiemens) and a much wider frequency response, that you'll probably spend considerable time stabilizing the oscillator. It's not easy to build a tunable oscillator that operates over such a wide frequency range. Also, the grid and gate currents are quite different. It can be done because there are FET grid dip oscillators available. However, if you compare schematics, they are sufficiently different to require a rebuild. It's also criminal sacrilege to despoil such a vintage boat anchor. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 21, 5:11*am, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:02:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote: Free manual for the Eico 710: http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/eico/710/ I'm too lazy to find a DejaVu decompressor, but I expect there are some instructions and diagrams of the coils in the manual. .... Jeff, thanks very much for your suggestions and links. I have actually already downloaded BAMA manual (Dejavu plugin works great on IrfanView 4.20, saves as pdf) and I will get to work calculating the approximate inductances. The variable C is the only component they don't show the value for, but I'll take a guess, wind a coil and listen for the signal. Then with some trial and error I can probably come up with a couple of coils for the ranges I am interested in. I know the scale won't be accurate, but in this day of digital readouts it's not important. I am fascinated with the number of GDO's shown on N4XY's site - I remember seeing just Heath, Eico and an old Mullen. Thanks agn Rich OK8RF |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 21, 3:54*am, Michael Black wrote:
The coils are bound to have so many turns that they will be hard to count, unless someone actually unwound them. Open it up, see if you can figure the capacitance of the variable capacitor (or maybe there's a schematic somewhere that provides that information?), and then use the equations to figure out the needed inductance and then the number of turns to make that value of inductance. *Then you can use any size coil form, just so long as you can rig it to fit whatever the GDO is using for the coils to plug into. *Wind some extra turns, and then remove them if necessary (since it's easier to remove than add turns). It won't be exact, but any GDO dial is fairly vague. *The inherent capacitance of the coil will come into play, so you can decide whether it's best to have the GDO dial match at the high end or the low end. Thirty years ago there was an article in "73" about revamping a GDO, I think he solid-stated it but can't remember, but he didn't have a coil set either and described the process he went through to give it a set of coils. *I think it was radical surgery though, I seem to recall that he even changed the jacks used for the coils. *He took the easy way out, providing a jack to feed a frequency counter so the original dial was relatively unimportant. Michael *VE2BVW I think I have a pretty good idea from various pictures of Eico or other GDO's what the coils should look like. I want mainly to get the instrument operational on 80-20m ranges, so there won't be too many turns. I have the manual but there is no variable cap value - looking at it and comparing to standard BC band 365pF it can't be more than 50-80 pF per section. So as you say - calculate the inductance, wind a coil... etc. adjust the winding until I hit the dial on one end. Sounds like a lot of work for the old clunker, but I have the time and enjoy this kind of stuff... 73 Rich OK8RF |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:52:35 -0700 (PDT), charrid
wrote: On Sep 21, 5:11*am, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:02:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote: Free manual for the Eico 710: http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/eico/710/ I'm too lazy to find a DejaVu decompressor, but I expect there are some instructions and diagrams of the coils in the manual. Jeff, thanks very much for your suggestions and links. I have actually already downloaded BAMA manual (Dejavu plugin works great on IrfanView 4.20, saves as pdf) Duh. I use Irfanview heavily, but have never bothered to download the DejaVu plugin. Thanks. and I will get to work calculating the approximate inductances. The variable C is the only component they don't show the value for, but I'll take a guess, wind a coil and listen for the signal. That will work as long as you don't accidentally land on a sub-harmonic. Methinks a frequency counter might be more useful than tuning around the bands looking for the signal. If you have a capitance meter or bridge, it might be possible to measure the value of the tuning capacitor. Then with some trial and error I can probably come up with a couple of coils for the ranges I am interested in. I know the scale won't be accurate, but in this day of digital readouts it's not important. Chuckle. A few months ago, I won a used HP something universal counter on eBay because I wanted the extra digits of resolution. However, that was for period and event counting, not frequency. I am fascinated with the number of GDO's shown on N4XY's site - I remember seeing just Heath, Eico and an old Mullen. Search Google for "base dip oscillator" and "gate dip oscillator". There are a few designers that couldn't find the grid pin on the semiconductor devices. My Heathkit HD-1250 calls it a "solid-state dip meter". I don't know if this will help, but the HD-1250 looks very much like the Eico (other than the tube versus the xistor). Here's a table of coil values for it assembled from various parts of the manual: MHZ uH L1 1.6 - 3.4 171 red L2 3.2 - 6.6 41.1 orn L3 6.3 - 13 10.2 yel L4 12.5 - 26 2.62 grn L5 25 - 51 0.72 blu L6 48 - 100 0.196 vio L7 100 - 250 ???? brn As usual, no value on the tuning capacitor in the manual, but it can be calculated from the above data. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eico grid dip coils | Swap | |||
Eico 232 ? | Boatanchors | |||
EICO 723 XMTR & EICO 722 VFO | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: EICO 723 and EICO 722 60W. Xmtr. & VFO | Boatanchors | |||
WTT Eico 324 for Eico 377 | Boatanchors |