Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art, with your knowledge of antenna theory I'm surprised you'd ask this
question. You should know that whenever energy is taken from one direction it is directed in another--none is lost due to cancellation. If you integrate all the energy radiated in all directions from a given antenna system (neglecting losses due to attenuation) it will be the same whatever the arrangement of the radiating system when fed with the same power. Walt, W2DU "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... Presumably the nulls between lobes on a radiation pattern are a result of radiation cancellation. IF this is true then it means we have not harnessed all the radiation available. What are your thoughts about that Dave? Can you relate the number of nulls in a radiation pattern with the number of elements in a planar array? You are the expert aren't you? Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Multi lobes | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
Dipole antenna lobes question (wifi base in this example) | Antenna | |||
Penn State fractal antenna reduces unwanted lobes | Antenna | |||
Radiation from wire | Antenna |