Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 24, 3:33*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
*But then, all is known about antennas and if it were possible as the experts state or we would have been using such antennas years ago !!!!! This might even include you if you were to actually try using one. But, then the parade would come to an end, as you would see that there is no free lunch. Or as another person stated we don't need a different *type of beam radiation as we already have one!!!! So by all means crush any and all ideas of change I know you hate yagi antennas, but did it ever occur to you that the nulls are an advantage to many operators when receiving. Heck, I bet just as many people use directional antennas for the receive qualities as they do for any directional gain. Whacking about 20 db off a west coast kilowatt can come in mighty handy when you are trying to hear weak DX in Africa. Of course, with an equal opportunity dummy load, the null will be in all directions. So not only are you screwed as far as directional gain vs an efficient antenna, you also lack the directional qualities which many have great use for when receiving. I suspect your invention using this "new science" will be a flop at the box office. Reboot and try again. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Multi lobes | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
Dipole antenna lobes question (wifi base in this example) | Antenna | |||
Penn State fractal antenna reduces unwanted lobes | Antenna | |||
Radiation from wire | Antenna |