On Sep 25, 2:15*pm, (Richard Harrison)
wrote:
Art wrote:

"So by all means crush any an all ideas of change."

In antennas and masers size matters. Diamagnetic materials matter more
in masers than in common antennas.

It was not long ago that we had an antenna design so why should we
need another
No you have come out with an epistle that size matters. Truely the
thoughts of an older woman.
Richard by not learning how to use a computer you are living as much
in the past as McCain.
If you had given a reasion for such a statement you would have my
attention but you give nothing
and so I have nothing to add







Keep searching for a highly focused beam from a tiny spot or speck. When
you succeed, patent it and you may become secure in your fame and
fortune.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

Art Unwin wrote:

...
It was not long ago that we had an antenna design so why should we
need another
No you have come out with an epistle that size matters. Truely the
thoughts of an older woman.
...


Actually, I suspect that what you say may hold deeper truths than some
realize, perhaps even than you realize ...

If the ether exists in a form some have imagined, if it is possible to
couple efficiently to this ether, then a one-inch antenna should be on
the same level of effectiveness as a one-hundred foot one.

The "if(s)" is the problem ... and directly relates to that little
problem of proof which has been requested ...

Regards,
JS

On Sep 25, 5:46*pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
...
It was not long ago that we had an antenna design so why should we
need another
No you have come out with an epistle that size matters. Truely the
thoughts of an older woman.

* ...

Actually, I suspect that what you say may hold deeper truths than some
realize, perhaps even than you realize ...

If the ether exists in a form some have imagined, if it is possible to
couple efficiently to this ether, then a one-inch antenna should be on
the same level of effectiveness as a one-hundred foot one.

The "if(s)" is the problem ... and directly relates to that little
problem of proof which has been requested ...

Regards,
JS

If one is in continual denial why would one want his aproval?
If ones reputation is based on the number of senior moments he has
each day
why would one need his aproval? If one is in continual denial then
truth has no meaning
and thus he is errelavent.