Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 5, 11:29*am, "Frank" wrote:
The results you are measuring are certainly within the range of the MFJ 259. As an example: a 493 ft dipole, 50 ft above an average ground shows anti-resonance, at 1.9 MHz, and is 15,000 ohms. Frank Frank, that is twice that you have mentioned dipoleas a comparison. May I remind you again that for equilibrium purposes the radiator must be a wavelength or multiple there of, assuming ofcourse we are considering a single radiator To talk of a "dipole" when considering my design is totally unreasonable. Regards Art But that is the typical input impedance of a one wavelength long antenna (15,000 ohms). Frank Yes Frank but you have to remember mine is a new design. The antenna is now on the ground and has a resistive impedance of three figures. I anticipate that when I put it on my 30 foot tower the impedance will drop on top band by 50% where I will add a transformer to drop it to 50 ohms. Now on the other bands it may well not need a transformer so I can play around on 20 M for the winter until I can achieve a good match or place a tuner at the tower top. As I have stated many times a radiator does not have to be straight so figures found with a dipole are just not applicable in my case. In fact a anti resonant impedance can be driven below 50 ohms if one wanted to so prior findings are just not applicable. In a month or so you will be able to put my antenna on your computor program and check for yourself I promise you. Regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lens' observations ... | Policy | |||
IMD observations | Shortwave | |||
Initial Observations on the Eton S350DL and the Kaito WRX911 | Shortwave | |||
Observations and predictions on the NPRM | Policy | |||
WGN 720 Silent Period-Observations | Shortwave |