LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 1st 08, 12:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 625
Default Going tp put this antenna up today

On Sep 30, 4:37*pm, Owen Duffy wrote:
JIMMIE wrote :

...

The evaluation of this antenna should start with connecting a choke
type BALUN at the input to isolate feedline radiation. A few feet of


Then it is not the same antenna as described.

I agree with your implication that an antenna of this type warrants an
attempt to minimise common mode current on the feedline... but that is
not a part of the design as described.

I have not said anywhere that this antenna doesn't 'work' or does 'work'
whatever that means, just commented on their opinion that it defies
conventional explanation.

They haven't suggested that the problem is their own limitation in
modelling or explaining, so it is reasonable to assume that their
implication is that it just cannot be explained in conventional terms and
using accepted tools.

I have questioned that assertion, I think it is not all that difficult to
model. It presents no more challenges than dealt with in my models of a
Bazooka (http://www.vk1od.net/DoubleBazooka/index.htm)andG5RV
(http://www.vk1od.net/G5RV/index.htm) assuming an ideal balun.

I know the ideal balun condition appears inconsistent with my first par,
the problem is that including the feedline common mode path in the model
is complicated by the huge variability from one installation to another,
both the length and route. (It is possible to model the antenna with a
specific common mode configuration... it is just that is has limited
applicability.)

I am tempted to do it one day. Although it isn't the same antenna in that
it has a balun, it is revealing. My gut feed is that the antenna with
balun is probably not that band on at lease many of the HF bands... more
if you ditch the coax section and use open wire feeder to a balanced
ATU... but we are moving further from the original.

Having said that, I do think the published VSWR figures at 145.3MHz are
fanciful and highlight your average ham's obsession with VSWR, as if that
single metric was a good indicator of system performance.

Owen


With enough RG58 any antenna's VSWR looks pretty good.

Jimmie
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got my TG-33 amplified M.W. loop antenna today! Jim Hackett Shortwave 16 February 8th 06 01:28 AM
New Tape Antenna Advertisement I received Today Nick Caratzas Shortwave 1 December 31st 05 11:46 AM
New Tape Antenna Advertisement I received Today Tom Holden Shortwave 5 December 31st 05 09:20 AM
New Tape Antenna Advertisement I received Today Brian Hill Shortwave 2 December 31st 05 05:21 AM
FA: ANLI RD-88H ANTENNA SCANNER HAM DUAL BAND *** Ends Today!!! Ivory Kid Antenna 0 August 17th 03 06:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017